My comments are in, supporting option 3 and not on support of the other 2.
My main point (I hope it comes through in my comments) was that there is already a lot of land set aside for non-motorized use in the area. The DNR collects registration fees and gas tax dollars from recreational vehicle users in the southern part of the state and has an obligation to provide areas for use, regardless of the tally of responses to the survey.
Dave in WI
"Daddy, it's five o'clock sometime!"