Originally Posted by eatpasta
FWIW, the AMA's press release, and other conversations on this incident, would have been greatly improved if they had mentioned upfront the anti-splitting bias/agenda of the petitioner. Instead, they read as a response to a crank who made a fuss over a technicality in how something was approved for posting to a website - obscuring his true intent.
I don't think Mander has a strong case, but I do recognize the risk attendant to his petition, that it will morph into another all-out attack on lane-splitting practice in California. That
can not be tolerated.