Originally Posted by Andrew
FWIW, the AMA's press release, and other conversations on this incident, would have been greatly improved if they had mentioned upfront the anti-splitting bias/agenda of the petitioner. Instead, they read as a response to a crank who made a fuss over a technicality in how something was approved for posting to a website - obscuring his true intent.
well, we are just assuming that's his true intent and Im sure that AMA didnt want to open itself up to lawsuits from this guy or others for assuming things.
However, the handwriting is on the wall