Originally Posted by C Squared
People could choose to wear a lid or not. If you chose not to your insurance is 5X more (or whatever the bean counters compute) I think that would be fair. Lidless folks get a choice that they have to pay for.
Just curious - why would you want them to pay 5x more in insurance? I think some data would be in order: Do lidless riders have more accidents? Do lidless riders have more fatalities? I don't know what the data would reveal, but I bet it's not as clear cut as we imagine.