ADVrider

Go Back   ADVrider > Fluff > Shiny things
User Name
Password
Register Inmates Photos Site Rules Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 07-06-2013, 06:44 AM   #1
TEXASYETI OP
Call me "thread killer!"
 
TEXASYETI's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Oddometer: 1,886
Thoughts on a 65 Mustang Fastback

Been looking for awhile so this is not a complete impulse buy. I do think it is a solid car but just wondered what others might think. The buyer says he is firm and I am going to see the car Tuesday.

Here are the particulars:

1965 mustand fastback 2+2
289 2-barrel
3 speed auto

1 owner car from california but been in new mexico the last ten years

restored 20 years ago so it has fair paint and good interior

original motor with car. Rebuit at 135,000 - now at 195,000

Basically all original. No upgrades or customization.

Owner says only rust located at door drain hole.

No wrecks - ever.

He says he wants 16,000.

Any thoughts?
__________________
BobFV1 to Putts: "Congrats on the bike. Also, congrats on having a dog with a perfectly heart-shaped asshole."

1981 R80G/S
1991 R100 GSPD

FIRST TIME RIFF RAFF - Go Jonah!
TEXASYETI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2013, 07:02 AM   #2
jeep44
junk collector
 
jeep44's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Location: Canton,Michigan
Oddometer: 1,961
http://youtu.be/CF90cpT5exw
jeep44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2013, 07:06 AM   #3
broncobowsher
Beastly Adventurer
 
broncobowsher's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Location: Baking in AZ
Oddometer: 1,242
Hard to say without getting a good close look at the car. But that looks to be a fairly decent price. Down a lot from the peak of the market. If you don't buy it at that price, someone else probably will.
broncobowsher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2013, 07:24 AM   #4
chazbird
Beastly Adventurer
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Oddometer: 3,166
Family had a 'new 65 GT 4 speed Fastback when I was a young teen. Its a cool car and we were agog. For some reason they replaced it in late '66 with a new '66 Mustang convertible automatic - $3150 or so. Maybe they got that because they were anticipating the kids soon learning to drive. Anyway, if it has drum brakes they are very weak and often need new pads/linings - otherwise, if remember correctly, the second car lasted nearly ten years with nothing major going wrong.
chazbird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2013, 07:35 AM   #5
Navin
Beastly Adventurer
 
Navin's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Oddometer: 6,851
For a few K more you can get a brand new 2014 V6 6 speed with 305 HP that won't leak, bubble rust the paint, wobble down the road or break down every 2k miles. At least not yet or for 25 years!

My buddy was looking at a 66 vert and I steered him to a new 06 V6 vert. Says it was the best automotive move he ever made, and the 66 would have been the worst.

My son bought a "stripper" 14 V6, it is an all around nicer and better car than my 03 Mach 1, except for torque. The AC is incredible, the handling is better stock than mine with mods, the dash doesn't shake like it isn't bolted down, it goes on and on. Mine has 24,000 miles!!!

The 4.56 gears in my Mach are nasty, but when he gets 4.10 in the V6, he will have an awesome package with lower highway RPM than mine from the wide ratio 6 speed. The new structure from 05 up is just great.

As great as the older cars look, they are still a 60s Falcon under the fenders!
Navin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2013, 07:45 AM   #6
Navin
Beastly Adventurer
 
Navin's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Oddometer: 6,851
BTW, 65 fastbacks are great looking cars, I do get it.
Navin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2013, 08:00 AM   #7
patmo
Studly Adventurer
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Location: butler, ky/Franklin, tn
Oddometer: 592
I went through college with a 65 Mustang, a car that I have always loved ever since my uncle got a new red fastback in 65. Always been my favorite car...especially the fastback.

However, even though I have had several chances to own another one over the last 20 years, I haven't pulled the trigger. I don't believe I ever will. In truth, as much as I have fond memories of my Mustang, it was really a piece of s**t car, that was basically worn out at 100K. A major part of that was the rust that the car was not prepared to resist when built. Today's cars do everything better and last much much longer as well.

The real question for me becomes....Am I willing to spend that much money on a toy that looks killer, but doesn't drive, ride, handle, or last anywhere near what I can get for less money?

Me? I take that 16K and either buy a couple more bikes OR look at a more modern car that will do EVERYTHING better than the 'Stang. One that I could also take on a road trip and not worry about breaking down. One that I could just enjoy DRIVING.
patmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2013, 07:07 AM   #8
Navin
Beastly Adventurer
 
Navin's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Oddometer: 6,851
Quote:
Originally Posted by Navin View Post
BTW, 65 fastbacks are great looking cars, I do get it.

As one of the assholes to suggest a new one, I also stated "I get it" on the old ones. That friend I mentioned wasn't mechanical, nor aware of the limitations, care and mechanical appetite of a 1966 vert. He wanted a semi daily driver.

If I had room and $ to burn, there might be a 60s Fairlane or Galaxie under a barn roof somewhere, but I'd grab the keys to a 2014 Mustang 9.9 times out of ten. Even the base V6.

Go drive one, it's free to test! MSRP $22,000. And, unlike a TDI, it is still everything a Mustang should be.
Navin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2013, 07:52 AM   #9
Bueller
Cashin?
 
Bueller's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Location: Hide Away Hills, Ohio
Oddometer: 17,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by Navin View Post
For a few K more you can get a brand new 2014 V6 6 speed with 305 HP that won't leak, bubble rust the paint, wobble down the road or break down every 2k miles. At least not yet or for 25 years!

My buddy was looking at a 66 vert and I steered him to a new 06 V6 vert. Says it was the best automotive move he ever made, and the 66 would have been the worst.

My son bought a "stripper" 14 V6, it is an all around nicer and better car than my 03 Mach 1, except for torque. The AC is incredible, the handling is better stock than mine with mods, the dash doesn't shake like it isn't bolted down, it goes on and on. Mine has 24,000 miles!!!

The 4.56 gears in my Mach are nasty, but when he gets 4.10 in the V6, he will have an awesome package with lower highway RPM than mine from the wide ratio 6 speed. The new structure from 05 up is just great.

As great as the older cars look, they are still a 60s Falcon under the fenders!
Agreed. That's why the old Mustang I dreamed of owning for 30 years turned into the purchase of an 08 GT500. I couldn't be happier with my choice. I don't have to do anything more than put gas in it, drive it, clean it once in a while, and enjoy it.
__________________
"Bueller, you're an island of sense in a sea of bullshit" - swimmer

"bueller, you ARE an island of reason in a sea of bullshit" - quasigentrified
Bueller is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2013, 09:39 AM   #10
Gimpinator
Slightly Annoyed
 
Gimpinator's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: Chillin' in da LB
Oddometer: 1,069
With that many miles, the car is going to need A LOT of work. I love the early fastbacks, but any old Mustang basically drives like crap after a certain number of miles. The car will need to be completely stripped down, suspension and steering rebuilt, new driveline parts, etc. I've also had bad surprises with other people's engine rebuilds. Sometimes it's not much more than a can of Krylon and some Chinese chrome valve covers.

Things like water pumps, radiators, window regulators, rubber trim and seals, wiring harness connectors, headlamp switches and ignition switches will make you crazy unless you replace them. BTDT!

If you love the car, it's worth it. Just be prepared to find a lot of crap under the surface. The price seems to be fair market though IMHO.
__________________
"Son, I thought by now you would have run out of stupid."
Gimpinator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2013, 10:10 AM   #11
Speedo66
Transient
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Location: Cin City, OH
Oddometer: 6,228
I've had a number of collectable cars, including 4 first series Mustangs.

As long as you understand it's a toy, a hobby, etc. rather than an everyday driver you'll be fine. It will take some effort to keep it on the road, but if you're OK with that, it's a lot of fun to have something different. Buying a newer Mustang is not the equivalent.

Now, specifically to the Mustang: before you even look at the exterior/interior, get down on your back and do a complete lap around the underside of the car. Bring a small screwdriver and poke, everywhere, looking for rust, extra heavy undercoating covering rust, and Bondo, you guessed it, filling in rust. Also check the front and rear fender wells and shock towers. Lift the carpet and look for rust. If you haven't got the message yet, these cars rust. When they were first producing them, there was a buying frenzy to the point that the factories were shipping them out, as fast as possible, without even spraying the inside door metal. Yes, bare metal was being sold! They sold almost 1 1/2 million of them in 3 years, a record not yet equaled. This is what made Lee Iacocca.

There are sheet metal boxes under the car that add strength, plus the rockers help support the car. The car is unibody, so no separate frame, the floor pan and related sheet metal parts are the frame, so be very, very careful. This rust can be repaired, but it's pretty expensive work.

There are many vendors selling repro parts, probably almost enough to assemble a new car. So getting parts, patch panels, floors, etc. is not a problem except for cost.

There are several mods to increase the handling ability to the level of the Shelby's, including lowering the suspension points, better shocks and springs, poly bushings, better brakes, etc., but it's still going to handle, and stop, like a '60's car. Just be sure you know what you're getting into.

The early fastbacks are arguably the best looking model, and currently the most expensive. Good luck with your toy!
__________________
Oh I used to be disgusted, but now I try to be amused-E.Costello
'01 Kawasaki W650, '05 Yamaha XT225



Speedo66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2013, 03:51 PM   #12
Anorak
Woolf Barnato
 
Anorak's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: OAK
Oddometer: 32,415
It won't depreciate and any part you need is easy to get N.O.S., reproduction or aftermarket.It also looks better than any Mustang made after 1967.
__________________
'Gonna get me a six pack...push people off the highway!'

"they live off the carrion of our mutual distrust and bribe us with symbols that equate hatred with manhood."

"I mean at the end of the day, I was addicted to Starting Fluid for Christ's sake!"

"Yeah, that guy sure is terrible at touching moms"
Anorak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2013, 04:09 PM   #13
chazbird
Beastly Adventurer
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Oddometer: 3,166
Tell me, which ride, the 1965 or the 201X, is the Kinks "Sunny afternoon" going to sound better in?
chazbird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2013, 04:42 PM   #14
DMZ
Castor Bean Addict
 
DMZ's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2004
Location: NE Oregon
Oddometer: 10,048
My $0.02

Look for:

Wire spoke hubs - desirable
Original Mustang paint color? - most were blue or red
Sounds like it does not have the 289HiPro (it would have a 4bbl carb, different cam and lifters)
Check the springs/shocks, OEM springs were notoriously soft and weak
Check dash padding for cracks
60k on a rebuilt 289 is a lot, IMO, it may not have much life left in it.
Check front buckets for any cracks in the vinyl

$16k seems a bit high unless it is 90% or better.

I had a '65 hardtop (271 HP Windsor V8 engine/ 3 speed auto) that was the coolest car I ever owned. I rebuilt the engine at 105k then the auto-tran went south. Sold it while I was overseas with the US Army.
DMZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2013, 06:53 PM   #15
Navin
Beastly Adventurer
 
Navin's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Oddometer: 6,851
Quote:
Originally Posted by chazbird View Post
Tell me, which ride, the 1965 or the 201X, is the Kinks "Sunny afternoon" going to sound better in?

On the perfect day, perfect road in a perfect example, the 65 is great.

If the temps rise above 57f, the tar isn't absolutely perfect and the radio is stock, the 2014!
Navin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Share

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


Times are GMT -7.   It's 03:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ADVrider 2011-2014