![]() |
11-17-2012, 07:04 AM
|
#16 | |
|
Studly Adventurer
Joined: Dec 2009
Location: between the Smoke & Muskoka
Oddometer: 500
|
Quote:
Even the scientist in the interview says that it isn't 100% efficient. Meaning it can't run forever. As soon as you add the mechanics to create power the efficiency would drop from the extremely high percentage it's at to something closer to the machines we already have. Also someone has to start the ball rolling right? It doesn't mean that he has a power source, it just means he has to push the ball and it can run for a ridiculous amount of time. That being said every machine we have now was created through an evolution of ideas. So if one man can come up with an idea that's more efficient than previously thought, maybe someone else can take that idea and improve on it. We don't necessarily need perpetual motion, but an efficiency of 80-90% could certainly change the way the world works. On a side note, does it seem like most of his art is just 3D porn?
__________________
Drillers' go deeper!
|
|
|
|
11-17-2012, 05:42 PM
|
#17 |
|
Gnarly Adventurer
Joined: Nov 2008
Location: Fargo, ND
Oddometer: 164
|
I'm embarrassed to ask now that no one else has but...wtf are those? I see pine cones/tiny grenades...then I see the image title of cuckoo clock weights...then I think, so what? Why would simple weights (given, shaped fancy like pine cones) within the pillar discredit what the video says the contraption does?
|
|
|
11-17-2012, 08:02 PM
|
#18 |
|
Adventurer
Joined: Nov 2012
Oddometer: 9
|
its more than possible, its been done, i've seen it with my own eyes. ... rare earth magnets are really magnificent,, and thats all i will say about it.
|
|
|
11-17-2012, 08:15 PM
|
#19 | |
|
Beastly Adventurer
Joined: Sep 2005
Location: Eastern Washington, USA
Oddometer: 1,235
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
11-18-2012, 02:49 AM
|
#20 | |
|
Beastly Adventurer
Joined: May 2002
Oddometer: 21,548
|
Quote:
Perpetual motion is a nice dream, but its a practical impossibility - even if you could harness the motion to drive power supply that kept the system up, bumping that output up to provide any useful energy will degrade the system. |
|
|
|
11-18-2012, 06:57 AM
|
#21 |
|
Beastly Gnarly
Joined: May 2012
Location: VA
Oddometer: 287
|
I think devices like these always capture the imagination. Cold fusion and room temperature superconductivity are two others that come to mind. The second law of thermodynamics prohibits perpetual motion or 100% efficiency.
One of the tenants of science is being able to reproduce or duplicate an experiment or device. That is how cold fusion and room temperature superconductivity were found to be non existent (up to now). If this fellow is legitimate, he can provide plans or instructions to make a similar device. Getting a patent for such a device is difficult because patent officers will not allow perpetual motion devices (because of the second law of thermodynamics). Magnets and magnetic fields have long been a 'source' for such devices, including the earth's magnetic field. However, none have 'panned out' to create a new era of scientific knowledge and discovery. There is a reason some scientific principles are declared 'laws', that is because they are true 100% of the time (i.e. cannot be violated). I wish him luck and can appreciate his enthusiasm and creativity. |
|
|
11-18-2012, 10:15 AM
|
#22 |
|
Rides slow bike slow
Joined: Aug 2008
Location: New(er) Mexico
Oddometer: 9,531
|
I think we can all agree on one thing: That guy is better at molding shapely tits than he is making legitimate perpetual motioin.
__________________
You couldn't hear a dump truck driving through a nitro glycerin plant!Cobbie Award Winner |
|
|
11-18-2012, 10:22 AM
|
#23 |
|
Banned
Joined: Nov 2008
Location: Your Back Yard
Oddometer: 6,505
|
Um, because if its continued motion depended upon someone adding energy (by lifting up a cuckoo clock weight once a week), it wouldn't exactly be what your thread title claims it is.
|
|
|
11-18-2012, 10:25 AM
|
#24 | ||
|
Banned
Joined: Nov 2008
Location: Your Back Yard
Oddometer: 6,505
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
11-19-2012, 10:12 PM
|
#25 |
|
Rustled softly.
Joined: Oct 2007
Location: Black Hills
Oddometer: 2,003
|
__________________
"I swear to god, it's like I live in a trailer of common sense, and stare out the window at a tornado of stupidity." -Roscowgo |
|
|
11-19-2012, 10:24 PM
|
#26 |
|
What could go wrong?
Joined: Mar 2007
Location: Beautiful Revelstoke BC
Oddometer: 4,960
|
Would any of you believers be interested in a bridge?
![]()
__________________
Kawasaki H1 build thread 71- 450 Honda CL re & re Just another pathetic sheep following the herd |
|
|
11-19-2012, 10:55 PM
|
#27 |
|
Beastly Adventurer
Joined: Sep 2009
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Oddometer: 2,030
|
The ideal almost perpetual motion machine would be something like a flywheel on magnetic bearings in a vacuum. Even then, no perfect vacuum exists and it will eventually slow down.
So why are these supposed perpetual motion machines always such complicated mechanisms; full of components which must have friction and slow things down? Simple - to obfuscate how they feed energy into the system and to fascinate the audience. No one would believe a simple flywheel because they can see it is not special. They need to see an Escher-esque ramp system or other plausible looking mechanism to believe in. The thing is, a successful perpetual motion machine would still only be a curiosity. The difference between a very low loss bearing and a no loss bearing would save some energy in machines, but it won't generate any energy. It might let you save 30% on your fuel costs in your truck, but it won't make the truck run for free. What you want is not a machine which is 100% efficient (breaking the second law of thermodynamics, you can't break even), but one which is 150% efficient, or even just 100.001% efficient (breaking the first law of thermodynamics, there's no such thing as a free lunch). |
|
|
11-19-2012, 11:07 PM
|
#28 |
|
plainsman
Joined: Nov 2005
Location: out in the great wide open
Oddometer: 89,066
|
You doubters are really messing up a good idea here.
__________________
_______ |
|
|
11-19-2012, 11:14 PM
|
#29 |
|
Beastly Adventurer
Joined: Sep 2009
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Oddometer: 2,030
|
Our scepticism is keeping the entry price cheaper for canny investors like yourself.
|
|
|
11-19-2012, 11:16 PM
|
#30 |
|
plainsman
Joined: Nov 2005
Location: out in the great wide open
Oddometer: 89,066
|
I don't invest, I just point the way.
__________________
_______ |
|
|
![]() |
| Share |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|