![]() |
11-28-2012, 12:37 PM
|
#16 | |
|
Banned
Joined: May 2012
Location: Leavenworth, WA- in the mountains!
Oddometer: 341
|
Quote:
. ![]() There are volumes of information as to why here. These two great guys' webpages offer plenty of information and inspiration- http://www.rickramsey.net/WR250Rmods.htm http://www.bigdogadventures.com/WR250R.htm What as I see as WR250R positives are the dualsport and adv travel characteristics of the WRR. The bike is smooth, dead reliable (except the fuel pump) and low-maintenance. I prefer to spend more of my free time riding instead of wrenching- I did ride 7k miles this past season, mostly dirt road and singletrack, four adventure trips across WA from May to Nov ![]() The dirt-riding is individual. Most of it depends on the rider, I have lived that on my little red bike leaving others behind that are much more acclaimed motos. I have in the past ridden eastern woods clay-mud and Piedmont sand, seems like different requirements. Small bikes have the rep and by my experience are great for the tight woods. Low end torque beats HP in the real tight and tricky steep stuff- have lived that.WRR lacks the low-end in the torque v HP relationship. It will be interesting next summer to try my WR250R on the climbs that I rode on my CRF230L where a WRR did not make it. The powerband will require a different riding approach, will be fun to see how I do with it. Lots of good reasons to pick a WR250R!
ADVNCW screwed with this post 11-29-2012 at 09:10 PM |
|
|
|
11-28-2012, 03:50 PM
|
#17 | |
|
Southern Ontario
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Oddometer: 2,000
|
Quote:
WRR = 298 http://www.yamaha-motor.com/sport/pr...5/1/specs.aspx KLX250S - 297.7 lbs http://www.kawasaki.com/Products/pro...id=698&scid=14 I have ridden both, and both are good bikes, but I chose the blue one. jon_l screwed with this post 11-28-2012 at 06:17 PM |
|
|
|
11-28-2012, 04:15 PM
|
#18 | |
|
Adventurer
Joined: May 2012
Oddometer: 54
|
Quote:
I've already ridden those areas on various different bikes, including the KX. In fact I had already considered ridding some of the closed course, start-control formats on the KX as well. I would go for the smaller Husky or KTM two strokes but I'm also looking for something that requires little care and can be ridden on the street. I'm looking hard at dumping both dirt bikes and getting TWO new D/S. That's why the price point is kind of an issue. If it was just one I'd go Husky. Most of my ridding is about spending time with my kid to make up for all the time I missed because of this shitty job. Not so much about being fast. I was fast 25 years ago. |
|
|
|
11-28-2012, 08:53 PM
|
#19 | |
|
Needs to STFU
Joined: Jan 2008
Location: That buzzing in your earhole, CA.
Oddometer: 7,778
|
Quote:
I hear ya about going fast. I ride a hair above granny speed. But I'd rather spend 1k more up front and get a KTM that needs the exact same maintenance as a Japanese bike but is 100x the bike, much lighter, more power on demand, 100x the suspension, etc etc. Again, don't take my word for it. You ride the NorthEast. What do you see people riding? Because every ride I went on when I lived in the Northeast was 50-70% KTM.....for a reason. Japanese bikes are good, but they need to be built to a price point, and the the things they skimp on are critical parts like brakes, suspension, wheels, components like bars/pegs, etc. Most people dump thousands into their Japanese bikes to upgrade performance. Additionally, there isn't a bike made that you can just ride and put away. Any bike will need attention....air filter change, chain lube, basic checks, etc. A KTM or Husky will need more valve checks, yes, but the same amt of oil changes if ridden in the same terrain. I don't believe for a second that Japanese bikes are built better or more reliable than Euro bikes. In fact, my direct experience is the exact opposite. Your mileage may vary. Pretty small price to pay.
__________________
Wedding = $25,000 Divorce = $500 Brazilian 2nd wife = Priceless 2007 Triumph Tiger 1050 ABS
|
|
|
|
11-28-2012, 09:00 PM
|
#20 |
|
Studly Adventurer
Joined: May 2012
Location: canyon country, ca
Oddometer: 815
|
im almost your height at 5'9'', i weigh less then you tho at around 150, i had a 250 dual sport, switched to a DRZ400, and will probably never go back to a 250 again, the DRZ has more power on the bottom and will get up in the higher 90's with stock gearing, its a great bike, not to mention theres tons of used ones for sale on cl, so a good deal is easy to find, good luck.
__________________
Just some dude... |
|
|
11-28-2012, 10:05 PM
|
#21 |
|
Adventurer
Joined: Jul 2012
Location: USA...somewhere
Oddometer: 56
|
I wouldn't overlook the Honda CRF250L. Honda didn't have to splurge for engine development (the motor is lifted from a CBR250R) and it's made in Thailand so the bang for buck is very, very good. Having ridden it next to my WR250R, I prefer the ergonomics of my WR, and it makes far more power with the power programmer and modded exhaust. However, the CRF250L is definitely a more tranquil trail ride.
__________________
WR250R |
|
|
11-30-2012, 03:33 AM
|
#22 |
|
Baby steps...
Joined: Jun 2008
Location: Marion, MA
Oddometer: 1,753
|
I'm with OtG...find a good condition used KTM RFS in the displacement of your choice.
Of the choices you list, I would be flipping a coin to decide between a WRR and DRZ...but only if Huskies and KTM's didn't exist
__________________
"turn it on man, turn it on-whatever, whoever you are-TURN THE FAWKER ON!" -Herbert Foster Gunnison 01 Girlie 09 TE450 |
|
|
![]() |
| Share |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|