![]() |
12-06-2012, 07:35 PM
|
#1 |
|
Studly Adventurer
Joined: Aug 2010
Location: Moab
Oddometer: 902
|
Thinking about buying a leftover 2012 350sx-f
Anyone with experience riding this bike off-road? I ride technical stuff- desert, I currently ride a 2007 400xcw, like it but want less weight.
|
|
|
12-06-2012, 07:59 PM
|
#2 |
|
Gnarly Adventurer
Joined: Aug 2012
Location: Lakewood, CO
Oddometer: 205
|
Friend of mine has one and loves it. He rides technical single track all the time.
|
|
|
12-06-2012, 08:35 PM
|
#3 |
|
Studly Adventurer
Joined: Aug 2010
Location: Moab
Oddometer: 902
|
Thanks, I'm a bit worried about the bottom end....and top-end!
|
|
|
12-13-2012, 08:32 PM
|
#4 |
|
Gnarly Adventurer
Joined: Aug 2008
Location: Redlands, Colorado, USA
Oddometer: 220
|
In my opinion , It is a Supercross bike. I know a few MX riders here in GJ, they had never really done any trail riding..when they did it the first time on their track bikes, they were hurting..They tried it on trail, enduro bikes and were blown away by the difference...soo, SX-f.. Great for the track, big hits, double triples, and whole shots....as such, it's going to be punchy off the bottom end and into mid-range. I believe these are 5 speeds, and have a stiff suspension. For riding around Moab or GJ and longer trail rides, I'd go with an Xcw or cross country oriented bike...you can still do technical stuff, but more of it without getting beat up..
__________________
Wilderness is not a luxury but a necessity of the human spirit.
Edward Abbey |
|
|
12-14-2012, 07:53 AM
|
#6 |
|
Wow, these guys are fast
Joined: Apr 2005
Location: Duvall, WA
Oddometer: 214
|
Any chance you could get a ride on one before you purchase it? They are a lot of coin.
Keep in mind the SX models don't have the electrical output of the XC or EXC models, so if lighting is something you would like, it won't support it without a stator rewind (or aftermarket stator) and some additional bits. The 19" rear wheel is a bit more prone to flats, no kickstand, and the muffler is not USFS spark arrestor approved. I believe the gas tank is smaller then the XC and EXC but not sure on that one. The big ones for me would be less flywheel wieght, so more prone to stalls, more snappy power delivery (can be good or bad depending on what you like). And of course the suspension as someone mentioned above, good for MX, not so good for off-road. Lastly, the 350's don't weight that much less then the 450's, although some say they feel lighter.
__________________
I don't know karate but I do know ca-razy. '06 KTM 125SX |
|
|
12-14-2012, 08:29 AM
|
#7 |
|
Studly Adventurer
Joined: Aug 2010
Location: Moab
Oddometer: 902
|
Thanks guys! I've decided against it. I think that if I was a racer it would be great, the biggest thing for me in the versatility department is the 5-speed closed ratio tranny. I think the suspension would be fine though (maybe a bit harsh in 1st and 2nd), I've ridden a 2011 350xcf and 2011 250 xc with stock suspension when I weighed 180ish (fluctuate between 175 and 195) and I could do with stiffer valving and proper springs.
I think that the power delivery ? is right on also, but this is more a factor of your left hand than your right in technical stuff.....and I need a better left! I just don't wannahafta change sprockets all the time......thanks CC! |
|
|
12-14-2012, 08:58 AM
|
#8 | |
|
Studly Adventurer
Joined: Aug 2010
Location: Moab
Oddometer: 902
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
12-14-2012, 09:10 AM
|
#9 |
|
Gnarly Adventurer
Joined: Apr 2008
Location: Idaho
Oddometer: 404
|
As a 2011 350 xc owner I would not give up so fast.SX is the same motor as XC except for 6 speed tranny.Same electrics so I put a Trail Tech stator in so now I can basically run anything I need.I put stiffer spring in rear and it is great suspension. I ride Moab area 2 weeks a year and it works excellent.There is no hit on the bottom end of the 350 motor.Pulls smooth and possibly a little weak a small percentage of the time. I weigh 270 ready to ride and this is one sweet ride. The other thing about the 350sx is that they are very cheap.
|
|
|
12-14-2012, 12:08 PM
|
#10 | |
|
..ouch
Joined: Feb 2011
Location: 8532'
Oddometer: 1,524
|
Quote:
If you bought the SX, you'd be smokin' him in no time. |
|
|
|
12-14-2012, 02:26 PM
|
#11 |
|
Studly Adventurer
Joined: Aug 2010
Location: Moab
Oddometer: 902
|
Sweet! Guys get my autograph now...I'm going from lowly low intermediate to the best, "in no time"!!!!!!!!!!
For real though, I read that the guy can't use the factory titanium axels because he bends them too soon, so he has to use stock axles (steel) to get through an endurocross (and replaces them after every ride).
|
|
|
12-14-2012, 02:40 PM
|
#12 | |
|
Beastly Adventurer
Joined: Jun 2008
Location: Durango CO
Oddometer: 1,604
|
The 50/50 landing on that log at :38 would certainly explain why he needs beefier stuff.
![]()
__________________
I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure
Quote:
|
|
|
|
12-14-2012, 03:07 PM
|
#13 | |
|
..ouch
Joined: Feb 2011
Location: 8532'
Oddometer: 1,524
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
12-14-2012, 03:44 PM
|
#14 |
|
Studly Adventurer
Joined: Aug 2010
Location: Moab
Oddometer: 902
|
It's easy to find faults in his riding if you look!
|
|
|
12-14-2012, 04:33 PM
|
#15 | |
|
Beastly Adventurer
Joined: Jun 2008
Location: Durango CO
Oddometer: 1,604
|
I wasn't criticizing his riding, just saying if you operate at that level of aggression the bike isn't going to last.
__________________
I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure
Quote:
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Share |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|