![]() |
12-20-2012, 09:22 AM
|
#4096 |
|
Adventurer
Joined: Nov 2010
Location: Grand Duchy
Oddometer: 82
|
|
|
|
12-20-2012, 09:40 AM
|
#4097 |
|
Gnarly Adventurer
Joined: Dec 2007
Location: Fruit County in Golden State, USA
Oddometer: 260
|
|
|
|
12-20-2012, 10:19 AM
|
#4098 |
|
Gnarly Adventurer
Joined: Sep 2011
Location: Scotland
Oddometer: 199
|
sorry I misunderstood.
|
|
|
12-20-2012, 10:43 AM
|
#4099 | |
|
I'm the Decider
Joined: Nov 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Oddometer: 3,315
|
+1
When I was in the business selling oilheads, the riders who broke them in hard and fast never seemed to have issues with oil consumption. The guys who babied the bikes during break-in, obsessed about oil level, and constantly topped them off had bikes that continued to burn oil. I think it was more an issue of their bikes being slightly overfilled, but you'd never convince the owners of this, who never seemed to be happy unless their oil levels were at the very top of the sight glass circle. My opinion has always been that if you've got oil within the circle, you've got plenty of oil. Quote:
__________________
'11 Ducati Multistrada 1200S Sport "Stormtrooper II" '09 BMW HP2 Sport '98 Ducati 900SS Final Edition "The old whore" '93 Ducati 900SS "Slightly older whore" "Gentlemen. You can't fight in here. This is the War Room!" |
|
|
|
12-20-2012, 05:09 PM
|
#4100 |
|
Gnarly Adventurer
Joined: Dec 2007
Location: Fruit County in Golden State, USA
Oddometer: 260
|
|
|
|
12-20-2012, 06:00 PM
|
#4101 | |
|
Beastly Adventurer
Joined: Nov 2003
Location: Swellvue, WA
Oddometer: 9,702
|
Quote:
You say the DL650 felt heavier than a GS, but I rode both for a period and felt the exact opposite - the Wee felt a LOT lighter, more than the 50-lbs difference in absolute weight. Likewise, S10 proponents say that it carries its weight better than a GS and has a lower CG, but looking at the two bikes, I'd bet the CG of the S10 is higher and to me, the S10 feels every bit of 40-odd lbs heavier than a GS to me. Having ridden all three extensively, I'd peg them as "feeling" about as the numbers stack up: 475 (Wee) - 530 (GS) - 575 (S10). Mostly, I see this argument that a bike "carries its weight better" is used as way to deflect criticism of a bike's absolute weight. In the end, weight is weight and I think bikes of similar design carry it more or less similarly. - Mark |
|
|
|
12-20-2012, 06:02 PM
|
#4102 |
|
.
Joined: May 2009
Location: Sunny California
Oddometer: 3,475
|
Hmmm. Not so certain about that. There is certainly an element of personal impression involved, but the rest is generally measurable, it's just never measured.
|
|
|
12-20-2012, 10:12 PM
|
#4103 |
|
Gnarly Adventurer
Joined: Oct 2010
Oddometer: 245
|
.
Yes, it would be useful to have some sort of *objective* measurement of how "heavy" the bike is to wrestle with when it's at standstill or at walking pace. Showroom impressions of "easiness to manhandle" are too subjective ~ varying form day to day or from showroom to showroom, when comparing different types of bike. Height of CoG [if that term doesn't cause meltdown here !!!] would be a starting point, of sorts . . . but how believable would it be, in view of the difficulty of independent verification . . . and the trouble we've had getting realistically honest dry/wet weights to be quoted by manufacturers. A more intuitive & comparable figure would be some sort of force [pounds or kilogram-weight] that the rider's foot needs to exert in order to support the bike when it is leaned over [at standstill, of course] to an angle of [say] 30 degrees from vertical. This would need to be in standardised conditions, with foot at such and such distance [from the original midline of bike ~ 24"/60cm ?], with vertical force measured, . . . and so on. That would give an idea of the relative "wrestle-ability" needed to correct a bike that's gotten to an uncomfortable angle stopped ~ or is being ridden very slowly on rough ground. Still not so easy for the average citizen to verify . . . but if needs must, it could be done in a rough'n'ready way by using bathroom scales and a certain amount of ingenuity . . . and two strong assistants. "Trust but verify!" . |
|
|
12-20-2012, 10:32 PM
|
#4104 |
|
.
Joined: May 2009
Location: Sunny California
Oddometer: 3,475
|
That's pretty much what could be done. But nobodies going to do it. There's no way the manufacturers and the press is going to muddy the speculation and bullshitting with hard, verifiable facts ...
|
|
|
12-20-2012, 10:39 PM
|
#4105 |
|
Studly Adventurer
Joined: Dec 2004
Oddometer: 723
|
what a interresting subject
But there are so many of pics like that on internet that I'm quite sure this will be the real test to be done : the amount of muscle needed to continue the journey... At that moment plus or minus 6.5kg is meaningfull (at least if alone) http://www.advrider.com/forums/showt...&highlight=hp2 ![]() ![]()
__________________
GSMarc from BELGIUM 2008 HP2/MM ABS 2008 HP2/MM 2005 HP2E 2000 R1150GS (sold) GSMarc screwed with this post 12-20-2012 at 10:48 PM |
|
|
12-20-2012, 11:02 PM
|
#4106 | |
|
pass the catnip
Joined: Aug 2002
Location: Earth
Oddometer: 7,580
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
12-20-2012, 11:08 PM
|
#4107 |
|
Talks to cats
Joined: Jun 2005
Location: SF Bay Area
Oddometer: 5,314
|
So I'm not the only idiot who can drop the bike in maybe 2" of sand.
![]() ![]() Every time I tried to lift it the front end walked away from me.
|
|
|
12-20-2012, 11:43 PM
|
#4108 |
|
Gnarly Adventurer
Joined: Dec 2007
Location: Fruit County in Golden State, USA
Oddometer: 260
|
|
|
|
12-21-2012, 01:41 AM
|
#4109 |
|
I Ride Ms Piggy
Joined: Nov 2006
Location: Sydney, Oz
Oddometer: 1,798
|
Interesting maybe but not unusual. I also use that combination - it is a very practical all-round touring option
viz |
|
|
12-21-2012, 05:17 AM
|
#4110 |
|
wanderer
Joined: Jun 2009
Location: Western Vermont
Oddometer: 417
|
the measure that we seem to be talking about in lifting and maneuvering the bike around is center of gravity and center of mass(dynamic effects)
the boxer twin has traditionally allowed these to be lower...just like Porsche etc jacking the bike up for high ground clearance kills these benefits. what puzzels me in the new GS ia that BMW has again put the gas tank yet again at the highest(worst) point possible. They allso make the tail end of the bike unnecessary high...far more than the rear suspension travel demands, and this put both the side bags and top bags higher that necessary. all of these things raise the C of G, make the bike harder to pick up, and make slow speed dynamic handling more difficult. The F800 series atleast puts the gas lower under the seat. |
|
|
![]() |
| Share |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|