![]() |
01-22-2010, 08:25 AM
|
#16 | |
|
Gnarly Adventurer
Joined: Oct 2007
Location: central iowa
Oddometer: 235
|
Quote:
On the weight, the 3 fedex boxes came in at 165, i would guess theres about 20-30 pounds of boxes and packing material which gets it down to say 140, then taking off your old shock, wheels, and swingarm, maybe less another 80? So that puts it to 90lbs added weight. Keep in mind though to thats weight right on the ground so its hard to notice a really big difference and i was surprised even in the air it still felt quit balanced. |
|
|
|
01-22-2010, 02:05 PM
|
#17 | |
|
Potius Sero Quam Numquam
Joined: Jun 2004
Location: Pacific NorthWet
Oddometer: 4,406
|
Quote:
Thanks for the info. I had seen Aprilias on snowtracks but when I looked in YouTube it was the "Explorer" which seems to look a lot like the 2moto. Any comparison? |
|
|
|
01-22-2010, 02:33 PM
|
#18 |
|
Gnarly Adventurer
Joined: Oct 2007
Location: central iowa
Oddometer: 235
|
Ive never ridden them so i cant tell you how it rides but heres the main differences in design: The front ski mount is only mounted to the brake caliper so a hard impact might brake the fork leg or brake mount, 2moto kit uses a mount under the right fork leg as well for added bracing. You cant stud the explorer track which is a big concern around here as icy as it gets! Also it uses your stock swingarm and shock, depending on what position the track is in, ie if its all the way foward you loose alot of the rear suspension travel, and if you move it back all the way it puts a lot of added stress on the stock components and they have been known to break swingarms and blow rear shocks.
Main differnce though, I think would be in handling, the ad boivin kit uses bogie wheels with no slides, so the track will fold in a corner, the 2moto kit uses slides. Think of it this way, imagine a skier or snowboarder carving a edge on a hill, if that ski didnt hold firm and folded to contour to the snow I dont think they would be sticking to the side of the mnt. like they hoped! Again never rode this kit and I would like to hear from someone who has rode both to compare them. |
|
|
01-22-2010, 02:40 PM
|
#19 |
|
Beastly Adventurer
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Tampa
Oddometer: 10,906
|
Great pictures, looks like loads of fun!
There's a lot that can be done to get more grunt from the CRF if its needed
__________________
'09 Buell XB12XT, TL1000S, H1F, M620, CR250R, DR250SE, XR650R, Cota 315R Summer 2009 Ride Report http://advrider.com/forums/showthrea...1509c&t=507038 Summer 2008 RR. http://www.advrider.com/forums/showthread.php?t=367703 |
|
|
01-22-2010, 02:40 PM
|
#20 |
|
gooligan
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: Dubuque, Iowa
Oddometer: 4,384
|
Where in Iowa are you?
|
|
|
01-22-2010, 02:42 PM
|
#21 |
|
Gnarly Adventurer
Joined: Oct 2007
Location: central iowa
Oddometer: 235
|
|
|
|
01-22-2010, 02:55 PM
|
#22 | |
|
Potius Sero Quam Numquam
Joined: Jun 2004
Location: Pacific NorthWet
Oddometer: 4,406
|
Quote:
Interesting to see the adboivin kit being used in sand too, that has to be hell on the components. |
|
|
|
01-22-2010, 05:49 PM
|
#23 | |
|
Geek Adventurer
Joined: Jul 2001
Location: Orygun
Oddometer: 4,649
|
Quote:
I saw one snow bike kit in a youtube vid used in a small hill climb competition - it beat all the others. For any of those examples, whether tracked or wheeled, I would bet they would do a lot better with a Rekluse clutch too. One thing I noticed was that it seemed the snow bike kits in those examples were much less prone to wheelies. Probably the longer wheelbase combined with the weight down low in the rear. I don't think I would want to use the tracks in the sand though - besides the wear, you would pretty much be limited to the sand unless you had a base camp where you could switch back to a rear tire. I don't have sand dunes close to me, but I do have snowy mountains in the distance. Maybe next year - a job comes first.
__________________
'09 Husaberg FE570 '99 Beta Alp '04 Ducati MTS - sold Not all who wander are lost |
|
|
|
10-17-2010, 02:40 PM
|
#24 |
|
Geek Adventurer
Joined: Jul 2001
Location: Orygun
Oddometer: 4,649
|
So, Cyborg. Yesterday I was at the snowmobile show talking face to face with Bill King of 2Moto yesterday about this conversion. He said he is right now working on a conversion for the Aprilia.
I had seen a pic (on their website I think) of a kit on an Aprilia. I was talking to him about the conversion using my Husaberg. His advice was to get a different bike because it was just too hard and expensive to do with the new Husabergs due to the subframe. This would especially be true for me since I just got a subframe tank. Expensive as in thousands of dollars more. So now I can spend thousands on another bike or thousands on my bike. I am going to do neither - I will go with the Timbersled. I appreciate his honesty - especially since I am sure he knew it was probably going to cost him a sale. I did get a good look at both kits (and a glance at the Explorer). There is nothing like seeing something in person. I had seen the 2Moto kit before (at a dealer in Portland), but being able to compare them was good too (they were 5 minutes apart in the show, but I went back and forth at least 3 times as that was what I had paid the $10 to get into the show for - I don't care about sleds). The heritage of each kit is obvious in design approach and implementation, even in the terminology they use. The 2Moto kit comes from the bike world and the Timbersled from the sled world. Both are very well built machines. The Timbersled is noticeably larger and heavier. The larger track is not necessarily a bad thing. From what I have read, and from talking to two 2Moto owners, the Timbersled will do better in deep snow, especially up inclines and at slow speeds. OTOH, if you want something that is very agile and you are going to be working in snow that has a base that isn't much more than 2 feet down, then the 2Moto kit has the advantage there. I think the 2Moto kit will also handle jumps and bumps and so on because it is lighter and the suspension is between the track and the bike, kind of like the bike is designed. The Timbersled has a neat suspension, but 15 to 20 pounds heavier and a much longer track, and it looks to handle less like a bike in some regards than the 2Moto does. Also, I am assuming it will take more HP to drive it. I base this on looking at them and watching the vids of both and talking to some 2Moto owners who were also aware of the Timbersled. For my purposes that's okay. Also, I would need to ride both kits to verify that impression - I've ridden neither. The other things one 2Moto owner talked about was: a) the approach angle of the front of the track - for deep snow and hills this is important. The 2Moto kit has almost no angle whereas most snowmobiles and the Timbersled kit do. He said this gives that latter much better floatation in deep snow and to climb out of holes and up hills. b) The 2Moto drives the track from the rear where the TImbersled and snowmobiles drive it from the front. Not sure why this is important.
__________________
'09 Husaberg FE570 '99 Beta Alp '04 Ducati MTS - sold Not all who wander are lost |
|
|
10-17-2010, 08:02 PM
|
#25 |
|
Solo con rambo
|
B. From working with snowcats, snowmobiles and other random equipment at a ski resort I seriously doubt that front versus rear drive would affect anything. Cats use rear drive, sleds front, both really move through the snow well. I figure its probably just a factor of timbersled being sled guys.
I've never heard of the timbersled until now. I think it looks better to me than the 2moto. I really like that they incorporated the track design from a snowmobile. ![]() + ![]() ![]() That would rock. I really would like to get one of these snowbike kits, but for me, if I had the choice, I think I would go with something like a cr500. As light as possible 250+ with a track, and as much power as possible. Some of the 800 class 2 stroke, a 4 stroke turbo sleds are scary fast, but even they bog down sometimes in really deep snow uphill. Although that is probably more to the rider(me) than anything.
__________________
Alan My ride reports 2000 Xr650r Supermoto/dualsport ![]() 1991 Dodge Oversize...err 250 4wd Diesel ![]() 1985 me |
|
|
10-17-2010, 09:14 PM
|
#26 | |
|
Geek Adventurer
Joined: Jul 2001
Location: Orygun
Oddometer: 4,649
|
Quote:
I do think the snow plus the higher weight of the conversion requires more HP and fuel consumption than riding on wheels - naturally. We'll see. Sleds are much heavier and I am going to assume they won't be near as maneuverable as a snowbike.
__________________
'09 Husaberg FE570 '99 Beta Alp '04 Ducati MTS - sold Not all who wander are lost |
|
|
|
10-19-2010, 12:03 PM
|
#27 |
|
Solo con rambo
|
Sleds are heavier but don't get fooled into thinking they are not very manuevarable. Maybe less than a snowbike, but with a good rider and some skill a sled can do some pretty rediculous stuff. I rode the biggest of the big sled(utility sleds, 1200 pounds +) and even those could be hussled if need be. Sharp turns, powder and hills took a lot of commitment but it was possible. Remember that the sleds have almost 40 years of developement while the snowbikes are a fairly new idea(maybe 10 years)
That said, if they weren't paying me, I wouldn't have ridden them. The sports sleds were much more enertaining. I'm sure the snow bikes would be too. Mostly riding the sleds(and working at the ski resort) was a fun time in my life, so I felt like sharing.
__________________
Alan My ride reports 2000 Xr650r Supermoto/dualsport ![]() 1991 Dodge Oversize...err 250 4wd Diesel ![]() 1985 me |
|
|
01-21-2013, 10:27 AM
|
#28 |
|
Motorcycle Chum
Joined: Sep 2010
Location: Utah and thousand islands
Oddometer: 328
|
So is anyone riding these this winter??? I remember when they came out, I wanted one reallll bad. I live out west now and have a real job so they actually might be obtainable.
I have been thinking of getting rid of my street bike for a street legal single track enduro machine. Mainly looking at CRF450X, and WR450F. These have electric start as well which from watching vids online would be handy for a snowbike. So if any of your guys have one and really want a triumph speed triple let me know! ![]() I got a hold of some one from 2moto and I think I can get a demo ride in first. Been trying to find some one around SLC to let me take one for a spin in a field or something but no luck yet. The timbersled is very cool! but very expensive. and I think I would have a lot of over hang while transporting in my 99 tacoma. The 2moto seems to be the best all around from my research. I have seen some cheap setups of the boivin but I dont know if its worth it do go cheap for a snowbike. |
|
|
01-21-2013, 10:36 AM
|
#29 |
|
Gnarly Adventurer
Joined: Oct 2007
Location: central iowa
Oddometer: 235
|
Haven't heard to much on the 2moto's in the past 2 years. Timbersled has taking most of the business right now since they do so awesome in powder. I do prefer the 2moto on trails however, but as soon as you get in a couple feet of fresh the track wants to plow under the snow instead of staying on top of it.
They are getting more popular every year. Timbersled sold all 300 units last year by about december and this year they built 500 and I just checked a couple weeks ago they only had 9 left. Not sure if I can plug other forums here but snowest has a dedicated snobike forum now with tons of great information. |
|
|
![]() |
| Share |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|