ADVrider

Go Back   ADVrider > Riding > Layin' down tracks
User Name
Password
Register Inmates Photos Site Rules Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rating: Thread Rating: 171 votes, 4.84 average. Display Modes
Old 10-21-2013, 12:46 PM   #9781
DRTBYK
Long Haul Adventurer
 
DRTBYK's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Location: North Central Washington (state)
Oddometer: 4,985
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveAZ View Post
There is probably no ability to contribute much to this discussion from those having the perspective that my floptana is defective.

I'm very comfortable that in identical environments mine will behave the same as any other floptana that is functioning normally. If they don't behave the same, it's the operating environment that's different. The symptoms I see are reported by plenty too.

I tend to presume that anyone that puts forward the notion that I have a defective floptana is most likely trolling, either that or they are ignorant regarding GPS's and GNSS technology in general. Or both.

Oh well...
Seriously? Trolling? For what? I have no stake in Garmin. I eval any/all GPS units that I think are worthy of use in the Adventure Riding activity.

I accept that you are technically proficient although your reluctance to be a good consumer is baffling. As for my knowledge of GPS technology, my involvement in GPS started with my work on NavStar in 1972. I have degrees in Electrical and Mechanical Engineering and a Wildlife Ecology degree (for personal interests).

I would agree there is little discussion left in this topic.
__________________
Cheers,

Dan
All Things GPS
Reviews at www.GlobeRiders.com
DRTBYK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2013, 01:37 PM   #9782
SteveAZ
Beastly Adventurer
 
SteveAZ's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Location: AZ
Oddometer: 1,140
More plots...

These are from 15:10 to 18:25UTC this morning...

Floptana



76
(at same scale as floptana)



76
(scaled to fit)



Ublox
(at the 76 scaled to fit scale)


SteveAZ screwed with this post 10-22-2013 at 09:18 AM Reason: Deskew
SteveAZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2013, 01:45 PM   #9783
atlas cached
OX Ambassador
 
atlas cached's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Oddometer: 687
Excellent charts, Steve.

Seeing how poor the Montana functions compared to the 76, you can see the new Oregon 6xx is even worse than the Montana here.
atlas cached is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2013, 01:50 PM   #9784
Emmbeedee
Procrastinators
 
Emmbeedee's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Location: Near Ottawa, ON, Canada
Oddometer: 8,795
Quote:
Originally Posted by atlas cached View Post
Excellent charts, Steve.

Seeing how poor the Montana functions compared to the 76, you can see the new Oregon 6xx is even worse than the Montana here.
He seems to delight in showing how poorly his Montana works. Curse the darkness, kinda thing.


Sent using strings and tin cans and Tapatalk.
__________________
Want to know more about the Garmin Montana? See the Wisdom and FAQ Thread.
Want to know more about the Garmin VIRB? See here.
"The motorcycle, being poorly designed for both flight and marine operation, sustained significant external and internal damage," police noted.
Emmbeedee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2013, 02:03 PM   #9785
SteveAZ
Beastly Adventurer
 
SteveAZ's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Location: AZ
Oddometer: 1,140
Standard deviations:

Floptana - 2.89
76 - 0.69
U-blox - 0.77


RMS noise:

Floptana - 5.65m
76 - 1.4m
U-blox - 1.64m


90% confidence:

Floptana - 8.83m
76 - 2.21m
U-blox - 2.64m


The floptana clearly has much greater position noise. I sort of suspected this from waypoints I created. The filter for determining GPS track when stopped in floptana clearly isn't up to the task of dealing with it. At least I understand/confirmed the nature of the problem.

I will do another with floptana on the roof overnight to maximize clear sky and minimize multipath even though that's not real world. I have large block walls and trees that will undoubtedly aggravate multipath noise and reduce sky coverage. The roof should have none of those issue and since the only horizontal thing up there is the metal AC, they'll even a get a rudimentary ground plane.

These are very easy to produce and don't take more than a few minutes. Anyone with Excel can do it. I encourage others to go ahead and we can compare.

Just setup track logging to Record Method "Time" and Interval to "00:00:01" (this is where mine pretty much always is).

Let it log for a couple of hours. If you have archiving on (necessary to grab more than 10000 points - a bit less than 3 hours) then you will need to append the archived tracks. I just copy the file(s) directly from the memory and use mapsource to append but basecamp does the job too. Save as a .txt or .csv file and import the data into excel. Throw out (or ignore) everything but lat/lon. Convert lat/lon to meters:

Lat(m) = Lat(deg) / 180 x 6.371 x10^6 (earth mean radius) x PI
Lon(m) = Lon(deg) / 180 x cos(Lat(deg)) x 6.371 x10^6 x PI

I make two columns that subtract lat/lon in meters from the first used sample to "normalize" it.

Graph the (normalized) lat/lon in meters by slecting both columns and inserting a scatter chart....

SteveAZ screwed with this post 10-22-2013 at 01:42 PM Reason: corrected added statistics
SteveAZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2013, 02:14 PM   #9786
SteveAZ
Beastly Adventurer
 
SteveAZ's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Location: AZ
Oddometer: 1,140
Quote:
Originally Posted by atlas cached View Post
Excellent charts, Steve.

Seeing how poor the Montana functions compared to the 76, you can see the new Oregon 6xx is even worse than the Montana here.
The new Oregon has GLONASS too? Wow. The U-blox has GLONASS and is Galileo capable but I only have GPS turned on.

I suspect they all may do better on the roof but that's ideal conditions, not real world.

I've always been very happy with the 76 GNSS performance. I think the qudrifiler helix antenna helps but I don't think that would explain the huge difference. I've done scatter plots with the 76 over 24hrs where the RMS error was less than 1m (closer to 70cm).

The antenna I have on the Ublox is not very good and has zero ground plane. The PCB is barely larger than the patch antenna and has the U-blox module mounted on the underside. It's advantages are that it is *very* small and runs at 5Hz. I use these in some machine control applications.

I've got some really sweet, extremely high performance units but they're a pain to setup and frankly I've already extracted data from them. 20Hz, RMS errors with WAAS of <70cm and RMS errors using one as a diff base <2cm.
SteveAZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2013, 02:43 PM   #9787
atlas cached
OX Ambassador
 
atlas cached's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Oddometer: 687
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveAZ View Post
The new Oregon has GLONASS too? Wow. The U-blox has GLONASS and is Galileo capable but I only have GPS turned on.
Yes, the Oregon 6xx is GPS/GLONASS/Galileo/WAAS/EGNOS capable.

atlas cached screwed with this post 10-21-2013 at 03:07 PM
atlas cached is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2013, 05:25 PM   #9788
Albie
Kool Aid poisoner
 
Albie's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: Upstate SC
Oddometer: 8,593
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRTBYK View Post
Apparently not anyone.
Don't be so hard on yourself.
__________________
Good. Bad. I'm the guy with the gun.

Another day, another foot injury!
Albie is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2013, 09:05 PM   #9789
DRTBYK
Long Haul Adventurer
 
DRTBYK's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Location: North Central Washington (state)
Oddometer: 4,985
Touche...
__________________
Cheers,

Dan
All Things GPS
Reviews at www.GlobeRiders.com
DRTBYK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2013, 09:31 AM   #9790
SteveAZ
Beastly Adventurer
 
SteveAZ's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Location: AZ
Oddometer: 1,140
Lack of floating point precision in Excel caused a small but not negligible error that added skew to the charts. They are updated as well as the standard deviations. They sort of look like flying spaghetti monster.

I'm still pretty impressed by both how good the 76 is and how bad the floptana is. I'll likely do the rooftop test in the next few days.


If anyone would like to send me track logs, I'll be more than happy to create charts and give them the spreadsheet. Might be nice to get something more than a "sample size of one". It only takes me a couple of minutes to do them.

SteveAZ screwed with this post 10-22-2013 at 09:38 AM
SteveAZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2013, 02:13 PM   #9791
SteveAZ
Beastly Adventurer
 
SteveAZ's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Location: AZ
Oddometer: 1,140
Rooftop results... were extremely interesting... at least to me.


Drum roll please!

Four hours beginning at 06:00UTC today...


floptana:



76:



Ublox:



Table of results:



More flying spaghetti monster
SteveAZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2013, 02:16 PM   #9792
SteveAZ
Beastly Adventurer
 
SteveAZ's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Location: AZ
Oddometer: 1,140
So that's the objective information.

Floptana in the nearly ideal conditions on the roof produces *much* better results than in the less than ideal conditions of the yard.

My take...

My yard has clear view above about 15-20 degrees but is surrounded by block walls and a house that is also block constructed. There are two trees about 20' tall, one to the east and one to the west. I chose a point in the middle of all this about 4' above the ground around nothing conductive except the wiring to power the units.

The test spot on the roof was at the highest point on top of my heat pump along the apex line. Completely clear view to the horizon and with the exception of the downward sloping roof no nearby sources for multipath.

Floptana is still significantly worse than the other two which always perform pretty close. The 76 consistently wins and I expect that is due mostly to the quadrifiler helix antenna.

However when we take the floptana to less than ideal, its positioning performance goes to hell. My yard is actually pretty good conditions for a GPS, certainly far better than in an enclosed vehicle and better than a lot of real world. Maybe it's very sensitive to multipath? It always seems to have satellites although the logs don't give me useful stuff like DOP, SNR or number of satellites so I don't really know whether the satellites are dropping or it's just noise/multipath.

Regardless, this may explain why some folks don't always see the same problems with the map orientation being too sensitive to GNSS position noise, assuming they have enough.... errr, I won't go there... to understand and repeat the same conditions that create the map orientation problems so many users complain of.

It might be interesting to do some more comparisons of the 76 (seems a pretty good baseline) and floptana in various conditions. These take very little time to setup and document. The ublox is more of a pain anyway.....
SteveAZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2013, 05:05 PM   #9793
atlas cached
OX Ambassador
 
atlas cached's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Oddometer: 687
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveAZ View Post
So that's the objective information..
These are very interesting tests, Steve. I assume you were using the most current firmware available for the Montana?

I would be very interested to see the results from identical testing performed with a Montana loaded with Firmware 3.80, or older.

I think you might be surprised also.
atlas cached is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2013, 05:26 PM   #9794
SteveAZ
Beastly Adventurer
 
SteveAZ's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Location: AZ
Oddometer: 1,140
Quote:
Originally Posted by atlas cached View Post
These are very interesting tests, Steve. I assume you were using the most current firmware available for the Montana?

I would be very interested to see the results from identical testing performed with a Montana loaded with Firmware 3.80, or older.

I think you might be surprised also.
Dang.... good point. I have to admit to being pretty complacent about updating. I usually only do it when I'm doing a bunch of other stuff with the unit (e.g. backing up, moving all the archives to storage, cleaning up all the .gpx's, etc.), not just sucking tracks from it. It's running 5.1.

I'll update it sometime in the next few days (prolly the weekend) and repeat the run in the yard with it and the 76. Very easy to do. The power strip with the usb power cords is sitting on the table and I hadn't put the extension cord away yet...

I'll be surprised if it's much different. Be nice if it was. If it is a multipath problem there are usually more important things than firmware although it has a role in it.

I ought to take a look at the solar flux and geomagnetic data to see if anything's been up too.

Firmware is *the* factor for rejecting the GNSS position noise. Unfortunately that's probably much harder to test objectively. They may stuff the filtered track direction in the NMEA stream. Maybe in the garmin binary stream? Even so, I'd have to log that to a PC and parse it out and that's more time than I'm willing to spend. These tests I've been doing take about a minute to setup/takedown (the majority of the time is coiling up the extension cord!). Post processing's biggest timesuck is appending and stripping out the log data but that only takes a couple of minutes....
SteveAZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2013, 07:26 PM   #9795
atlas cached
OX Ambassador
 
atlas cached's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Oddometer: 687
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveAZ View Post
Dang.... good point. It's running 5.1.

I'll update it sometime in the next few days (prolly the weekend) and repeat the run in the yard with it and the 76.
I said 3.80 or older.

(make a complete archival copy of your Montana before loading older firmware)

The results will be very different, and probably not in the direction you might expect.
atlas cached is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Share

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

.
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


Times are GMT -7.   It's 07:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ADVrider 2011-2014