ADVrider

Go Back   ADVrider > Bikes > GSpot > GS Boxers
User Name
Password
Register Inmates Photos Site Rules Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 04-02-2013, 07:42 PM   #7951
erkmania
Still Adventuring
 
erkmania's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Oddometer: 983
Quote:
Originally Posted by Racegun View Post
Do you remember which shocks were not rebuildable?
No. I am not sure. I just checked my stock Showas (2011 GS) and they appear to have removable tube caps. The complexity is in releaving the nitrogen gas pressure and whether they are DeCarbon or emulsion type shocks. In either case, a schraeder valve must be installed to repressurize the shocks in the absence of using industrial machinery. I could be wrong, but I don't think so.

They key to identifying non-rebuildable shocks is evident by the fact that the tube caps are welded in place. Look at cheap car shocks for an example. In reality, they can be rebuilt, too. It just takes a LOT more effort to cut off the cap and find a way to reafix it. That's just something I have not gotten into. The other possibility would be to drill the body, evacuate the fluid and refill/repressurize the shock through the small drilling. Again, not something I've cared to do since some of these types of shocks have used freon bladders for their internal pressure. Too darned much trouble for me to care.

Clear as mud, right?
__________________
-Sticks and stones, love.
-Insurmountable problems exist in the imaginations of the less traveled.

2011 BMW R1200GS, 2004 KTM 950, 1996 ATK 605 ESDS
erkmania is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2013, 07:47 PM   #7952
erkmania
Still Adventuring
 
erkmania's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Oddometer: 983
Quote:
Originally Posted by Japanviking View Post
Good info!
I am also very interested in getting other springs. If the new ESA system is rebuild able and can be sprung for my weight it would be really good it think.

I also agree that the active suspension hardware must be simpler than conventional valve stacks...the intelligence is now electronic instead of mechanical.
It's my opinion that you could create a problem that will be caused by mismatching the spring rate to the damping invoked by the software. I just caution against radical spring rate changes.

However, this sounds like a worthy experiment. Come on over and we can work this out. I think you'll have to put some paddle tires on your bike, though, to get here.
__________________
-Sticks and stones, love.
-Insurmountable problems exist in the imaginations of the less traveled.

2011 BMW R1200GS, 2004 KTM 950, 1996 ATK 605 ESDS
erkmania is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2013, 07:54 PM   #7953
Shorty
carpe'diem ona motorcycle
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Location: Ripon, Ca.
Oddometer: 463
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedLeg View Post
Just got her home. Great ride, new fly by wire throttle is touchy in dynamic mode.
Nice
Congratulations!
__________________
Shorty
Shorty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2013, 08:06 PM   #7954
EJ_92606
Rider
 
EJ_92606's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Oddometer: 1,779
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shorty View Post
Nice
Congratulations!
I second that. So how is the throttle in ROAD mode? On my test ride on a bike without modes, I thought it was overly sensitive and difficult to modulate. I can only assume they would use a middle of the road setting for a bike with no modes...but perhaps not.
EJ_92606 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2013, 08:13 PM   #7955
Japanviking
Adventurer
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Oddometer: 93
Quote:
Originally Posted by erkmania View Post
It's my opinion that you could create a problem that will be caused by mismatching the spring rate to the damping invoked by the software. I just caution against radical spring rate changes.

However, this sounds like a worthy experiment. Come on over and we can work this out. I think you'll have to put some paddle tires on your bike, though, to get here.
My thinking was that the adaptable damping would self adjust to a change in spring rate. Not talking about radical changes here, would just be nice to reach the correct sag levels without having the suspension set for rider+luggage.

I wonder if the different ride mode includes separate damping settings beyond the soft,normal and hard settings?
Would love to find a deeper technical description of this system.
__________________
BMW S1000RR -12
BMW R1200GS -13
Japanviking is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2013, 08:24 PM   #7956
oz97tj
Studly Adventurer
 
oz97tj's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Location: Fenton, MI
Oddometer: 819
Quote:
Originally Posted by maximo de la maximus View Post
Who's got some first hand experience programming the enduro pro plug? Who has some first hand experience having some fun on the road with the enduro pro plug? C'mon, I know you're out there!!
I have my plug and it's installed. It really doesn't do much though on the road. I still have stock tires so I haven't even toggled over to enduro pro mode yet to play with it. As for the road, it does save settings (namely the hard or soft settings) over the default setting but it's not really that big of a deal.
__________________
'13 BMW 1200 GSW
'05 Honda ST1300
oz97tj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2013, 08:40 PM   #7957
maximo de la maximus
Abracadabra Holmes
 
maximo de la maximus's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Location: Golden CO, Home of the Mothership
Oddometer: 56
enduro pro....

Quote:
Originally Posted by oz97tj View Post
I have my plug and it's installed. It really doesn't do much though on the road. I still have stock tires so I haven't even toggled over to enduro pro mode yet to play with it. As for the road, it does save settings (namely the hard or soft settings) over the default setting but it's not really that big of a deal.
Hmm. Thanks for the response- I am curious about driving with the epro toggled on with road rubber- just for the fun of it. Though maybe you get a similar same by simply shutting down abs, traction control, selecting dynamic? Just hijinks I suppose... but Saving preferred settings sounds convenient too.
__________________
MdlM
maximo de la maximus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2013, 09:38 PM   #7958
Crilly
Studly Adventurer
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Location: Wi/Az
Oddometer: 776
. Hay Shorty, this probably a dump question, considering, but is that a low seat?
Crilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2013, 09:47 PM   #7959
tallguy-09
Smile 4 Miles
 
tallguy-09's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Location: Vancouver
Oddometer: 1,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by EJ_92606 View Post
Umm, I think he was asking about the auxiliary lights
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxReving View Post
Is it worth it? I think that you can find a lot of arguments for that LED headlight will be more visible in daylight. If this means that you just one time will be saved from some old lady turning right out in from of you then the LED headlight may have saved your life. Then it is worth it. Does it make your night riding more safe? Well, only a thorough and factorial test will show that. I have not yet seen any such tests. One of the German motorcycle magazines will most likely do a test of the LED headlight in the near future.

I don't do a lot of night riding but I have still chosen the LED headlight and this only because I believe that it will have a positive effect on my safety and I have also chosen the additional LED lights to support this argument.

I might be wrong. If the old lady is blind then it may not matter if you light up your GS with a 5 mega watt headlight

Max :-)
I'd say definitely YES, no matter if LED or conventional. During the day a light triangle composed of main headlight plus lower aux lights works well.
tallguy-09 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2013, 10:07 PM   #7960
marchyman
Cam Killer
 
marchyman's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Location: SF Bay Area
Oddometer: 7,473
Quote:
Originally Posted by bolderboulder View Post
It's well built, sturdy, and fits the tank very well. Also, easy to move aside for adding gas. There's enough room for a small APS-C camera, or mirror-less like Fuji X-pro1 or Leica.
Thank you. At 8 liters in size (8,000 cc or about 25 cm x 20 cm x 16 cm) it should hold a bit more than that. I'm looking to store a liter of water, the other gloves, a wool cap, small binoculars, a compass, a small P&S camera, and other very small misc items. The real camera gear (7D and a X100) live in a tail bag.
marchyman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2013, 10:08 PM   #7961
oz97tj
Studly Adventurer
 
oz97tj's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Location: Fenton, MI
Oddometer: 819
Quote:
Originally Posted by maximo de la maximus View Post
Hmm. Thanks for the response- I am curious about driving with the epro toggled on with road rubber- just for the fun of it. Though maybe you get a similar same by simply shutting down abs, traction control, selecting dynamic? Just hijinks I suppose... but Saving preferred settings sounds convenient too.
Well, as I stated already I have tried enduro pro yet, but I don't see much benefit on pavement with road rubber. Dynamic mode would be more aggressive on the pavement. The big difference is ABS being shut off to the rear wheel. As for the traction conrol, other than for wheelies, it wouldn't really be kicking in anyway.

The saving the settings is kind of nice, but the reality is it only takes about 2 seconds to switch the suspension settings and to shut off ABS and ASC so unless you prefer them off all the time I don't see a huge benefit there. The only real time I want to kill ASC is when I plan on being a bit of a hooligan. ABS, I really never shut it off on my old GS, and this one kicks in far less than he old model so I doubt I'll even have a reason to shut it off.
__________________
'13 BMW 1200 GSW
'05 Honda ST1300
oz97tj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2013, 10:10 PM   #7962
Moronic
Beastly Adventurer
 
Moronic's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Oddometer: 1,673
Motorrad 2012 vs 2013 R1200GS ride comparison now online

Motorrad has posted online an article comparing the waterboxer with the 2012 GS, reporting on a side-by-side ride and various performance and static measurements.

Article begins here, with the ride report. For those who do not read German, Google Translate will help.

There is a measurements page here, which includes dyno curves.

A couple of interesting results:

- measured full-tank weights old and new were identical at 246kg (542lbs).

- the new model was quicker in all single-gear roll-on acceleration tests (e.g. 100-140km/h 3.8 sec v 4.2 sec).

- fuel economy was slightly better on the new model (by 0.2L/100km or US 2mpg).
__________________
Sorting out the S4Rs Ohlins shock: click here.
Moronic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2013, 11:02 PM   #7963
EJ_92606
Rider
 
EJ_92606's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Oddometer: 1,779
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moronic View Post
Motorrad has posted online an article comparing the waterboxer with the 2012 GS, reporting on a side-by-side ride and various performance and static measurements.

Article begins here, with the ride report. For those who do not read German, Google Translate will help.

There is a measurements page here, which includes dyno curves.

A couple of interesting results:

- measured full-tank weights old and new were identical at 246kg (542lbs).

- the new model was quicker in all single-gear roll-on acceleration tests (e.g. 100-140km/h 3.8 sec v 4.2 sec).

- fuel economy was slightly better on the new model (by 0.2L/100km or US 2mpg).
Thanks for posting...the Google translate is not so great, but I can at least comprehend parts of it and the stats of course. Was surprised that the 0-100km/h speed was only faster than the camhead by 0.1 seconds. During the test ride the bike felt much faster than that, but then again I suspect the massive thrust that is felt is based on some artificial throttle mapping as opposed to a substantial increase in power. The Motorrad test seems to confirm this.
EJ_92606 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2013, 11:11 PM   #7964
cug
--
 
Joined: May 2009
Location: Sunny California
Oddometer: 4,881
What I found more interesting is that the braking distance from 100km/h (62mph) was longer on the new model. Only in Enduro mode it got kind of close. New one is said to be more stable while braking, but needs longer distance.
cug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2013, 11:53 PM   #7965
GrahamD
Beastly Adventurer
 
GrahamD's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Location: Blue Mnts Ozstralia
Oddometer: 5,323
Quote:
Originally Posted by cug View Post
What I found more interesting is that the braking distance from 100km/h (62mph) was longer on the new model. Only in Enduro mode it got kind of close. New one is said to be more stable while braking, but needs longer distance.
Yes, just like the Tenere, Strom, etc. Less freak but a low speed impact at the end. Pros and Cons. Swings and roundabouts. Like to see an update of Motorrads ABS tests with the new gen ABS systems. But you knew that already.

Probably better off road than the older system if the S10 is anything to go by.
__________________
"It's better to ride a boring bike than push an interesting one" ... Canuman

"I just may as well admit that my other bikes are toast. I don't ride them. Plain and simple. I didn't want this. It wasn't the plan." - snakebitten
GrahamD is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Share

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

.
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


Times are GMT -7.   It's 06:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ADVrider 2011-2015