ADVrider

Go Back   ADVrider > Bikes > Road warriors
User Name
Password
Register Inmates Photos Site Rules Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 12-27-2012, 12:25 PM   #3886
rowdymoose
Carpe Diem-seize the carp
 
rowdymoose's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2007
Location: Marina del Rey, CA
Oddometer: 225
Quote:
Originally Posted by flatboarder View Post
Guess they were removed along with tail assembly for foto session.
I will not change my stock assembly at all, but will be looking for a perfect and professional paintjob which should be crucial for this kind of project. Other than this, I will not change my basic bodywork, but only those black parts, side panels, complete front part and sub-engine panels. No offensive grafics, no fist. Already contacted Lucas Design for details about their work, the cost of it and the options I have.
I specially like their wheel styling:
http://www.lucasdesign.de/ourwork/2_...se_2012/09.jpg

My favourite view: http://www.lucasdesign.de/ourwork/2_...se_2012/03.jpg
That is a great showcase to illustrate what a little paint can do to make this bike look completely different.

Would love to hear what kinda quote you get back on a paint job. I'd love to get the red that I've seen on the overseas version of the NCX, or even a darker cardinal color.
__________________
2012 Honda NC700X
rowdymoose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2012, 01:21 PM   #3887
cls
Studly Adventurer
 
Joined: May 2009
Location: N GA
Oddometer: 978
Very sharp, indeed. I'd throw on a shorty after-market exhaust to finish it off. Nice!
cls is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2012, 08:04 PM   #3888
rockydrxrvr
Multi Meter Meathead
 
Joined: May 2006
Location: Oregon Mountains, Great Riding,Not too cold.
Oddometer: 145
Well, I'm sold, but timing is off

Went to the Local Honda Dealership, for a test ride, streets still wet and showroom bike was dry. No test rides on ANY dampness visable on our local roads.
With serious checkbook talk, they would have prepped the bike for a 5 mile max test ride as/or their policy dictates.

Impression---Stock seat not too bad, I am 6' 4'', and with hip and back issues, I somewhat felt comfortable the way the stock seat has some rear glut/lumbar backing. If Sargent Seat makes a all day comfort perch, I will put one on in a FedEx minute.

In the cockpit, ah, er....I mean seat, I was sold on the bike on the merits of the LOW CENTER OF GRAVITY, as I rocked the bike from side to side, and best describe it as It had the light weight feeling of a 250 cc moto.

I also liked the seat to tank transition as my knees hugged the tank in a well thought out engineered wedge, as controlling this bike thru the twisties is going to be quite the grin maker.

So as things look now I will be planning on a California Hwy 96 ride to the coast in a New Concept 700 Mode about June1 , as I am already loaded for a 4 month journey by other means.

I like my DR650's midrange punch, so although the test ride is still coming, if this bike is all about low to mid range 'power up' then this rider in his 60's should be quite happy.

Of course anything and life's contingencies could change one's Moto horizions.

DR650
TTr250
ex/ Vstrom 650 & 1000---ex KLR650 ex XR650L
rockydrxrvr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2012, 01:13 PM   #3889
PacificPT
Studly Adventurer
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Location: Monterey, CA
Oddometer: 979
Quote:
Originally Posted by 100mpg View Post
so....you make less then your employees? or you just like to spend less!
Yeah kind of interesting; both of my employees who ride started riding after seeing me do it every day rain or shine. My KLR is 2000 model, both bikes they ride are much newer and nicer right up until you get way off the road where I tend to go on vacation when I can. I have ridden the 700x several times, really enjoy how it runs on the road. Great torque curve for the way I ride. I had a Transalp for many years; great bike. If Honda sets up a 700x with a setup similar to the Alp I would probably pry open my wallet. Until then I will keep plodding along on the KLR.
__________________
2000 KLR650

There's roads and there's roads and they call, can't you hear it? Roads of the earth and roads of the spirit. The best roads of all are the ones that aren't certain. One of those is where you'll find me till they drop the big curtain. Bruce Cockburn
PacificPT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2012, 01:20 PM   #3890
showkey
Beastly Adventurer
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: Wausau
Oddometer: 1,740
Quote:
Originally Posted by PacificPT View Post
I had a Transalp for many years; great bike. If Honda sets up a 700x with a setup similar to the Alp I would probably pry open my wallet.
I currently have both, most likely will be selling the Alp soon.................
__________________
1982 CX500 Turbo ,2006 ST1300, 2012 NC700X
1971 CT90,1981 C70, 1986 TRX 250,
1993 TRX300 4X4, 2001 TRX500 4x4, 1987 XR250L
showkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2012, 06:11 PM   #3891
caryder
Gnarly Adventurer
 
caryder's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Location: Phoenix
Oddometer: 200
Purchased NC700X Dec 26th

I purchased a NC700X recently and have only put 180 miles on it.The first 50 were easy miles around town then I took a 130 mile ride to Bartlett Lake and a long way around coming back. The second ride involved some freeway time, lots of two lane and some undulating dirt road. I bought the NC from Western Honda and they did let me test drive it prior to buying along with a CRF250L. The 250L by the way did not impress. It felt really heavy for a dual sport of that size and had the engine characteristics of a CRF 230. I was expecting more.

on the NC test ride I wasn't particularly pleased with the angle of the handlebars, the thinness of the grips and the clutch engagement. I still elected to buy it because I wanted good fuel mileage and a quiet no fuss motorcycle.

After the 130 mile ride yesterday, I noticed on the last 30 miles that hey... the clutch feels great! Nice long linear engagement. So that already seems to have improved.

Same goes for the suspension. Was stiff at first, particularly on Bartlett Lake road where small imperceptible bumps in the road didn't move the front suspension but were felt right through the handlebars. But then on a rolling dirt road with a few stutter bumps it felt pretty good. I'm sure the suspension will soften up over time where that comfort feeling might switch around to be better on the asphalt and less comforting on the dirt. Don't know, but I attribute the harsh feeling in the forks to stiction from the fork seals at this point.

The power delivery takes some getting used to but I more or less was expecting a decent 0 to 70 acceleration and then signing off after 80 based on the acceleration times from Cycle World. So while the bike may get up to 110 give or take, it takes a really long time from 90 to get to 110. I only saw 90 indicated on the ride yesterday and some of that was chasing a BMW 1200GS down a hill. On the way back up another hill the NC still held 90 but wasn't going to go any faster. And yes the GS could easily out accelerate me from what was already a good clip (around 65).

Still, for what I bought it for, an inexpensive commuter that can go on a long trip (which I rarely do). It seems a good fit for me. I'm a short 5'7" and have a varied background in motorcycling for some 40 odd years. The NC is replacing a Buell XB12X (which if for sale if anyone is interested). The Buell replaced an 1100GS and an SV1000S in 2008 which seemed like a good compromise of retaining sportyness yet an upright riding position.

The short time on the NC does make me appreciate the Buell for all of it's benefits, great handling, brakes, acceleration, but I'm looking to calm down a bit and I think the NC is the right direction for me. It still did a spirited ride on the twisty sections and seemed to pull the hills with little effort. But on the freeway, if you are already going 75 and want to go 85, it takes a little longer to get there where the Buell is effectively already there just thinking about it.

On the plus side for the NC, it's very smooth, linear acceleration, very flickable, feels much lighter than the Buell even though the Buell is actually lighter. Turn in is quick and effortless on the NC while the Buell requires a conscious counter steer or significant lean to the inside to hold the same line. And... the NC is really quiet and gets outstanding gas mileage. The last two items are what I was looking for along with the great initial cost.

Honda did their homework.

Then I found this thread today. It's comical how so many people will talk about a motorcycle model with authority (trash talk) without having ever ridden one. All of the comparisons to other middle weight machines that have higher initial cost and get significantly lower mileage are missing the point of the NC. And if any of those other machines are close in cost, the low CG is still the kicker on the NC. It feels lighter than any other bike I have every put a leg over other than my trials bike and my RD350 or RD400. If I want to get my thrills, I still have the RD400 which gets all of 25 MPG on expensive pre-mix.

The NC gets scooter mileage in a motorcycle package. That comes with a compromise in top end performance. On the flip side, the Buell "can" get over 50 MPG, averages around 43 and has a huge grin factor. I don't care what the journalists say, the NC does not excel in the hooligan department but... I didn't buy a Toyota Corolla hoping it would be a WRX. Still, if you ever tried to drive a Corolla fast, it can be fun because it handles reasonably well. It's no WRX, but it can still attack corners. I put the NC in the same category only its still a motorcycle and still a lot more fun, accelerates faster and gets better fuel mileage than a Corolla.

Anyway those are my impressions after 180 miles on the new NC.
__________________
Chuck
2012 Honda NC700X
2006 Gas Gas 300 Pro
2003 Kawasaki KDX220R
1976 Yamaha RD400C
caryder is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2012, 06:19 AM   #3892
cls
Studly Adventurer
 
Joined: May 2009
Location: N GA
Oddometer: 978
Nice review. Thanks...I know this is not why most folks buy, or look at, this bike, but has anyone done any performance mods to unlock performance potential: exhaust, FI mapping, timing, sub-throttle plates...whatever may be applicable to this model? If you could get another 10'ish+ hp w/a nice exhaust note and still get in the 60's for mpg's, that'd be a nice combo for me. Surely somebody somewhere is playing...
cls is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2012, 06:43 AM   #3893
andoulli
CAJUN
 
andoulli's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Oddometer: 2,114
I think it would be a challenge at best. This engine is based on the Honda Fit engine, it was designed from the start to be low revving, and very efficient, with decent torque down low. I would be very cautious messing with the mpg on this motorcycle with only 3.7 gallons sloshing around under your butt.
andoulli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2012, 08:56 AM   #3894
showkey
Beastly Adventurer
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: Wausau
Oddometer: 1,740
Quote:
Originally Posted by cls View Post
If you could get another 10'ish+ hp w/a nice exhaust note and still get in the 60's for mpg's, that'd be a nice combo for me. Surely somebody somewhere is playing...
Quote:
Originally Posted by andoulli View Post
I think it would be a challenge at best. .
Agreed challenge is an under statement...........10HP would be asking for a 20% increase.............extremely hard to do without very serious compromises..............some aftermarket exhaust cause a HP and or torque lose, but most do not admit it..............add the required no reduction in MPG makes this a near impossible feat.

Would be shame to destroy the torque curve on the stock NC trying to get 5 HP.
__________________
1982 CX500 Turbo ,2006 ST1300, 2012 NC700X
1971 CT90,1981 C70, 1986 TRX 250,
1993 TRX300 4X4, 2001 TRX500 4x4, 1987 XR250L
showkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2012, 09:06 AM   #3895
cls
Studly Adventurer
 
Joined: May 2009
Location: N GA
Oddometer: 978
Yep, I don't know much about the bikes potential w/changes. That's why I was wondering. I don't care about high-revving (In fact, I prefer it not require it.), but a little more punch and spirit sounds nice. May not be doable. Time and fiddling will tell, I reckon.
cls is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2012, 09:20 AM   #3896
andoulli
CAJUN
 
andoulli's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Oddometer: 2,114
Quote:
Originally Posted by cls View Post
Yep, I don't know much about the bikes potential w/changes. That's why I was wondering. I don't care about high-revving (In fact, I prefer it not require it.), but a little more punch and spirit sounds nice. May not be doable. Time and fiddling will tell, I reckon.
Just saying hp lives in the upper rpm range, probably not going to happen in a sub-700 cc motor that hits it's rev limiter at, what, 6500.
andoulli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2012, 09:56 AM   #3897
andoulli
CAJUN
 
andoulli's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Oddometer: 2,114
I just checked, a Kawasaki ZX-6R which makes 110 hp at the rear wheel at 14K rpm, makes exactly 50 hp at 6.5K rpm. Sounds a lot like a NC700X at 6500 rpm. So although you may not care about high revving engines, horsepower does.
andoulli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2012, 10:58 AM   #3898
klantbo
n00b
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Oddometer: 8
New member here from Sweden (sorry in advance for the crappy english)

Been reading these forums for a a while and this thread since this autumn. I just want to share my thoughts on this bike. I bought my ncx in late June and rode to October til it got too freakin cold and it whas time for winter storage. In these months i rode 11000km, 3200 of those was during a weeks vacation this summer. No planning, i just packed the bike and chased the sun(we had the crappiest summer in years). After 4 days of riding i went straight home 800km when a friend called and wondered if i wanted to pay him a visit at hes family home. Ofc i said, so the next day i packed the bike and rode 700km, visited him for two days and rode the 700km home again in pouring rain.. Not a single time have i bitched about this bike, i just love it, not even when i have to remove the dry bag every time i refuel have there been a frown on my face ;-)

Ive rode it everywhere, from highway to the smallest deertrails. Sure its not best at anything but it is a jack of all trades, and thats what i love.

I have rode bikes since i was four years old, enduro and mtx til i was 24 when i got my first street bike.
Bikes as follows
Ktm 625
Kawazaki z750
Ninja 900
Tt600r
Ktm superenduro
After that i bought the NCX. Im 190 cm and weighing in at 94kg and i have no problems with the size of the bike.

Well thats a short review of the bike and my background if it helps someone.
klantbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2012, 11:27 AM   #3899
JustKip
Beastly Adventurer
 
JustKip's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Location: Fresno, CA
Oddometer: 3,732
Quote:
Originally Posted by andoulli View Post
I just checked, a Kawasaki ZX-6R which makes 110 hp at the rear wheel at 14K rpm, makes exactly 50 hp at 6.5K rpm. Sounds a lot like a NC700X at 6500 rpm. So although you may not care about high revving engines, horsepower does.
+1
HIgh rpm's are required for small engines to produce big horsepower. If it's a big hit of power at lower engine speeds you want, there are a few expensive tricks you could employ and all of them will kill your fuel economy.
But really, for its engine size, you're not going to find more low end grunt at low rpm and continuing thru 6200. This bike already shines there, and if you want more than that your money would be better spent with a larger displacement twin cylinder engine. 3 and 4 cyls will give you more hp, but at higher rpm.
Big pistons = big torque. High rpm = high hp

For what it is, you're not going to do much better than a stock NC700 right out of the box, but you can spend a LOT of money chasing small gains.
JustKip is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2012, 11:42 AM   #3900
skysailor
Rat Rider
 
skysailor's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Location: Kenora, Canada
Oddometer: 3,338
Cayder...interesting that you compared it to a Corolla. That's just what I don't want in a bike. On the road, with the wife, or kids, the Corolla is a fine car. The same qualities that make it a fine car, make for a piss poor motorcycle, IMHO, at least. I'm assuming your bike did not come with ABS? Although this is not a "deal breaker" on it's own, I find it strange that Honda would make such a proven safety feature "unavailable" on a bike with a "standard" transmission? My present bike doesn't have ABS, but my next bike will. Hope you enjoy many safe miles on the 700. Me? If I go with Honda, it'll be the new CB1100! Only available WITH ABS up here in Canada......as it should be.
Lyle
skysailor is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Share

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

.
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


Times are GMT -7.   It's 09:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ADVrider 2011-2014