ADVrider

Go Back   ADVrider > Riding > Layin' down tracks > GPS 101 - Which GPS For Me
User Name
Password
Register Inmates Photos Site Rules Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rating: Thread Rating: 8 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
Old 02-06-2012, 08:23 PM   #1
MYT1 OP
Adventurer
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Oddometer: 68
BaseCamp vs. Mapsource

What is the difference between BaseCamp and Mapsource?

Is BaseCamp an updated version of Mapsource?

Thanks.
__________________
"How hard can it be?"
MYT1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2012, 02:51 AM   #2
dlh62c
Beastly Adventurer
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Oddometer: 1,598
A lot of new BaseCamp features are not included in MapSource (decent printing support, reading maps from devices, 3D view, Birdseye Imagery, geo-tagging of pictures).

Basecamp has at least one major advantage over Mapsource and that's that you don't need the actual maps on your computer. If you attach a Nuvi, for example, to your PC and fire up BaseCamp it will read and use the maps that are preinstalled on the GPS.

Overall, once you understand the differences in the user interface between the two programs, I think you'll find that BaseCamp is more feature rich.

Here's a link for some of the basics: http://garmin-mapsource.wikispaces.com/BaseCamp

daryl

dlh62c screwed with this post 02-07-2012 at 04:01 AM
dlh62c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2012, 10:44 AM   #3
MYT1 OP
Adventurer
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Oddometer: 68
Thanks, particularly since I know this question must've been asked a million times before.
__________________
"How hard can it be?"
MYT1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2012, 01:00 PM   #4
Countdown
Beastly Adventurer
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Location: Carson City/Ridgecrest
Oddometer: 4,904
Quote:
Originally Posted by dlh62c View Post
A lot of new BaseCamp features are not included in MapSource (decent printing support, reading maps from devices, 3D view, Birdseye Imagery, geo-tagging of pictures).

Basecamp has at least one major advantage over Mapsource and that's that you don't need the actual maps on your computer. If you attach a Nuvi, for example, to your PC and fire up BaseCamp it will read and use the maps that are preinstalled on the GPS.
On the flip side, I never used or ever plan to use nay of these features.

Not having maps in your computer can not be viewed as any kind of an advantage if you do any work on your computer at all. I have CityNav, topo, and Roads & Rec and switch between them many times in any given session.

If you have a new generation Garmin with maps and don't really do much on computer, BC is obvious choice but if like me you have thousands of MapSource files switching is out of the question.
__________________
Jerry Counts
Countdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2012, 04:36 PM   #5
DRTBYK
Long Haul Adventurer
 
DRTBYK's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Location: North Central Washington (state)
Oddometer: 4,878
Quote:
Originally Posted by Countdown View Post
On the flip side, I never used or ever plan to use nay of these features.

Not having maps in your computer can not be viewed as any kind of an advantage if you do any work on your computer at all. I have CityNav, topo, and Roads & Rec and switch between them many times in any given session.

If you have a new generation Garmin with maps and don't really do much on computer, BC is obvious choice but if like me you have thousands of MapSource files switching is out of the question.
I don't think that reading maps from the GPS is THE selling point to BaseCamp - just a handy feature "in case". I have many many maps on my MacBook Air for the same reason that Jerry does. But when it comes to using the software on a daily basis, I was so disgusted with MapSource and file management that I bit the bullet and imported all of my data over a weekend and was done with it. Never looking back.

Cheers,
__________________
Cheers,

Dan
All Things GPS
Reviews at www.GlobeRiders.com
DRTBYK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2012, 04:02 AM   #6
dlh62c
Beastly Adventurer
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Oddometer: 1,598
Quote:
Originally Posted by Countdown View Post
Not having maps in your computer can not be viewed as any kind of an advantage if you do any work on your computer at all.

If you have a new generation Garmin with maps and don't really do much on computer, BC is obvious choice but if like me you have thousands of MapSource files switching is out of the question.
Who says you have to switch all your thousands of files over to Basecamp at once. Just do the ones your working on or new ones. You can have both programs installed on your computer.

I do quite a bit of route planning on a computer. I use my 62s as a mass storage device. I store my maps and GPS projects on the SD card. With Basecamp installed on two desktops and a netbook, I can move between computers and work on any project I want too. All my maps, routes, waypoints and tracks move with the GPS. There's no need to have maps installed on multiple computers.

daryl

dlh62c screwed with this post 02-08-2012 at 04:15 AM
dlh62c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2012, 04:09 AM   #7
dlh62c
Beastly Adventurer
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Oddometer: 1,598
Quote:
Originally Posted by MYT1 View Post
Thanks, particularly since I know this question must've been asked a million times before.
Don't worry about it.

If you have limited knowledage of Mapsource, I'd go with Basecamp.

daryl

dlh62c screwed with this post 02-08-2012 at 05:48 AM
dlh62c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2012, 08:50 AM   #8
DRTBYK
Long Haul Adventurer
 
DRTBYK's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Location: North Central Washington (state)
Oddometer: 4,878
Quote:
Originally Posted by dlh62c View Post
I use my 62s as a mass storage device. I store my maps and GPS projects on the SD card. With Basecamp installed on two desktops and a netbook, I can move between computers and work on any project I want too. All my maps, routes, waypoints and tracks move with the GPS. There's no need to have maps installed on multiple computers.

daryl
Daryl, Are you saying you've directed your map/s and BaseCamp installations to a specific SD Card? So you need to have your SD Card volume connected to the computer/s anytime you want to use BaseCamp? If you use your GPSMAP 62s as the SD Card reader, I guess you obviously find the performance acceptable(?).

Cheers,
__________________
Cheers,

Dan
All Things GPS
Reviews at www.GlobeRiders.com
DRTBYK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2012, 09:02 AM   #9
dlh62c
Beastly Adventurer
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Oddometer: 1,598
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRTBYK View Post
Daryl, Are you saying you've directed your map/s and BaseCamp installations to a specific SD Card?

So you need to have your SD Card volume connected to the computer/s anytime you want to use BaseCamp?

If you use your GPSMAP 62s as the SD Card reader, I guess you obviously find the performance acceptable(?).

Cheers,
Yes to all your questions!

I have an 8g Class 4 Micro SD card in my 62s. Will you see additional performance between a Class 4 or a Class 6? Nobody seems to notice any.

I also use the SD card to store pictures and bike documents. It functions just like a USB drive.

I'm using an OSM map to route me around the state of Missouri.

I sent you a PM.

daryl

dlh62c screwed with this post 02-08-2012 at 09:13 AM
dlh62c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2012, 09:11 AM   #10
Countdown
Beastly Adventurer
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Location: Carson City/Ridgecrest
Oddometer: 4,904
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRTBYK View Post
I was so disgusted with MapSource and file management that I bit the bullet and imported all of my data over a weekend and was done with it. Cheers,
Enlighten me on this issue. To me, MapSource works just like Word or Excel with relation to files. I don't see any of them used for "file management", I use MS Explorer to manage files.

One problem I have is keeping track of where my "Master file" is for a given set of tracks. I have 2,300 files with just short of 1 Gig of GPS Track data. I have office Table Top where I work daily, Lap Top for work on the road in motorhome (and at events) and an external hard drive for back up.
__________________
Jerry Counts
Countdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2012, 07:36 PM   #11
DRTBYK
Long Haul Adventurer
 
DRTBYK's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Location: North Central Washington (state)
Oddometer: 4,878
Quote:
Originally Posted by Countdown View Post
Enlighten me on this issue. To me, MapSource works just like Word or Excel with relation to files. I don't see any of them used for "file management", I use MS Explorer to manage files.
Jerry,
If you read my post I said "MapSource AND file management."

As for data size, my personal BaseCamp backup file is just over 10GB in size and growing. I run most of the time on my MacBook Air laptop. I also travel with it and a 1TB USB HDD.

Cheers,
__________________
Cheers,

Dan
All Things GPS
Reviews at www.GlobeRiders.com
DRTBYK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2012, 07:53 PM   #12
Countdown
Beastly Adventurer
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Location: Carson City/Ridgecrest
Oddometer: 4,904
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRTBYK View Post
Jerry, If you read my post I said "MapSource AND file management." ,
For the bottom 1/3 of the class, do you mean having all data in one file vs having it all over the place in thousnads of files? That has been a problem for me and my failing memory.

I assumed that once you organize all your tracks in thousands of folders in BC, it would be the same problem.

Still don't see BC but just waiting for you to convence me I really really NEED to jump to Montana.
__________________
Jerry Counts
Countdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2012, 08:18 PM   #13
DRTBYK
Long Haul Adventurer
 
DRTBYK's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Location: North Central Washington (state)
Oddometer: 4,878
Quote:
Originally Posted by Countdown View Post
For the bottom 1/3 of the class, do you mean having all data in one file vs having it all over the place in thousnads of files? That has been a problem for me and my failing memory.

I assumed that once you organize all your tracks in thousands of folders in BC, it would be the same problem.

Still don't see BC but just waiting for you to convence me I really really NEED to jump to Montana.
The BC difference is that even with thousands of folders, you can simply select a folder and see all of its content on the map.

You don't need a Montana - you WANT a Montana!

Cheers,
__________________
Cheers,

Dan
All Things GPS
Reviews at www.GlobeRiders.com
DRTBYK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2012, 03:43 AM   #14
dlh62c
Beastly Adventurer
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Oddometer: 1,598
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRTBYK View Post
The BC difference is that even with thousands of folders, you can simply select a folder and see all of its content on the map.

Cheers,
Your referring to list folders created within the 'My Collection' Library of Basecamp correct, which is only supported in the beta versions of BC?

daryl
dlh62c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2012, 08:35 AM   #15
DRTBYK
Long Haul Adventurer
 
DRTBYK's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Location: North Central Washington (state)
Oddometer: 4,878
Quote:
Originally Posted by dlh62c View Post
Your referring to list folders created within the 'My Collection' Library of Basecamp correct, which is only supported in the beta versions of BC?

daryl
That is correct. We are expecting the v3.3.1 release soon which will provide that feature to the Windows BaseCamp.

Cheers,
__________________
Cheers,

Dan
All Things GPS
Reviews at www.GlobeRiders.com
DRTBYK is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Share

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

.
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


Times are GMT -7.   It's 10:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ADVrider 2011-2014