ADVrider

Go Back   ADVrider > Bikes > Old's Cool > Airheads
User Name
Password
Register Inmates Photos Site Rules Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 06-07-2012, 01:40 PM   #1
bernardofeio OP
Bernardo Feio
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Location: Portugal
Oddometer: 29
296 Enduro-torque camshaft

hello

did any one tried this cam:

296 Enduro-torque camshaft

any comments?

thks
bernardofeio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2012, 05:30 PM   #2
Box'a'bits
In need of repair
 
Box'a'bits's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Oddometer: 1,962
May be talk to Adventure950? Think he's dropped one in his new beast..
__________________
My '91 R100GS thread is here
My Ride photos are here

It's just better when there's twins involved....
Box'a'bits is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2012, 06:22 PM   #3
supershaft
because I can
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Location: San Francisco Bay area
Oddometer: 8,006
I haven't run one but I don't understand the need for the timing. How low do you want peak torque? Even our engines with flywheels don't have enough flywheel to be loading the engine much under 3000rpm anyway. They shake and shudder.
supershaft is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2012, 11:58 PM   #4
AliBaba
Gnarly Adventurer
 
AliBaba's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: Norway
Oddometer: 357
I used one for 50kkm and liked it.
The bike (R80) also had a 7rock 1000cm upgrade kit, 32mm carbs, and ported tops.
When I build the engine the goal was to improve torque and move max torque to approx 3500RPM. It got almost 80Nm at 3500RPM and with the R80 final drive it was a dream to ride offroad.
The power-band might be a bit narrow, but IMHO it's a nice and cheap way to get a better low and midrange.

The graph shows a standard R80GS Kalahari (red) and the modified (blue). The dip in the red graph at 3000-4000 RPM was later solved by replacing the y-pipe with a collector box.







Quote:
Originally Posted by Box'a'bits View Post
May be talk to Adventure950? Think he's dropped one in his new beast..
AliBaba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2012, 08:43 AM   #5
bernardofeio OP
Bernardo Feio
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Location: Portugal
Oddometer: 29
Hello

thks for your replays.

Alibaba:
the curves compare a 800cc standard with a 1000cc with 296 cam correct?

how does de bike perform on the road?
bernardofeio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2012, 11:57 AM   #6
supershaft
because I can
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Location: San Francisco Bay area
Oddometer: 8,006
I hate dyno sheets that have the torque and HP on two different pages and I hate them even more when they have metric torque and English HP. All metric or all English!
supershaft is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2012, 12:58 PM   #7
AliBaba
Gnarly Adventurer
 
AliBaba's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: Norway
Oddometer: 357
Quote:
Originally Posted by bernardofeio View Post
Hello

thks for your replays.

Alibaba:
the curves compare a 800cc standard with a 1000cc with 296 cam correct?

how does de bike perform on the road?
Yes, standard R80GS vs R80GS with Siebenrock upgradekit and ported heads.

It was a great on the road, always much more punch then the R80
AliBaba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2012, 02:09 AM   #8
Padmei
enamoured
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Location: Nelson New Zealand
Oddometer: 3,331
Nice lil increase in torque there.
Padmei is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2012, 11:15 AM   #9
supershaft
because I can
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Location: San Francisco Bay area
Oddometer: 8,006
The upgrade kit is 1000cc? Higher compression? And ported heads? If so, that can make a hell of a difference with a stock cam. I wonder what just the cam does?
supershaft is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2012, 01:50 PM   #10
AliBaba
Gnarly Adventurer
 
AliBaba's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: Norway
Oddometer: 357
Quote:
Originally Posted by supershaft View Post
The upgrade kit is 1000cc? Higher compression? And ported heads? If so, that can make a hell of a difference with a stock cam. I wonder what just the cam does?
Then you better install one on a standard R80

I've tried several R80 with just the Siebenrock kit and that's why I decided that a standard Siebenrock kit was not what I was looking for. My estimate is that this setub beats the standard Siebenrock up to 5700 RPM.
AliBaba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2012, 05:05 AM   #11
Rucksta
Chronic Noob
 
Rucksta's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Location: Gold Coast
Oddometer: 2,556
Quote:
Originally Posted by AliBaba View Post
Then you better install one on a standard R80

I've tried several R80 with just the Siebenrock kit and that's why I decided that a standard Siebenrock kit was not what I was looking for. My estimate is that this setub beats the standard Siebenrock up to 5700 RPM.

Thank you that's quite useful I haven't been over 6.000 RPM for some time but I do call on the motor to pull smoothly
from just over 2,000 it would be nicer if it was a bit more willing.

With the std peak torque at low 5s it's nice to cruise h-way speeds at a economical 4-4,500 RPM and have the motor willing to go .then go some more.

What's the enduro cam like overtaking weekend traffice on the two lane?
Have you got any fuel ecomomy figuresd yet?
__________________
My bike is slow but the earth is patient.
Rucksta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2012, 06:15 AM   #12
adventure950
Anglo-Saxon
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Location: Northumberland UK
Oddometer: 505
yep I got a 296 enduro cam also but also a siebenrock kit and twin plugs flowed heads 32 carbs. The bike pulls like a train from just under 2000 revs torque reads about 65nm at 2000 revs - smooth and easy, 2400 revs gets 70 nm the torque then stays pretty flat at 70 to 72nm through to just below 5500 revs where it tails off hp at these revs is about 67hp. All these figures were at the back wheel on full knobbly tyres. The bike is very usable at slow speed - i am currently running a 32/10 twin shock bevel box on the gs rear end the bike is very usable to about 90mph then it gets a bit more buzzy - but that could be something not quite balanced up (ie wheels tires etc never been balanced but keeps on pulling well upto about 100mph where she really starts to lose the will to go much faster but by then on this tank shes getting kind of interesting to hold onto.) Overtaking is easy top gear is usable from pretty low speeds right through so overtaking is fine. Fuel wise I get about 11 mile litre) so about 50 per gallon give or take a bit here and there depending on roads and speed etc. I have changed from a 2 into 1 with y piece ( siebenrock sgs2) since these figures to a non standard keihen race 2 into 2 system - so really a new dyno test should be run. The bike feels better with the 2 into 2 system.
__________________
'A tourist sees what he went to see,
a traveller sees what he sees'

adventure950 screwed with this post 06-12-2012 at 06:43 AM
adventure950 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2012, 09:22 AM   #13
supershaft
because I can
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Location: San Francisco Bay area
Oddometer: 8,006
Quote:
Originally Posted by adventure950 View Post
yep I got a 296 enduro cam also but also a siebenrock kit and twin plugs flowed heads 32 carbs. The bike pulls like a train from just under 2000 revs torque reads about 65nm at 2000 revs - smooth and easy, 2400 revs gets 70 nm the torque then stays pretty flat at 70 to 72nm through to just below 5500 revs where it tails off hp at these revs is about 67hp. All these figures were at the back wheel on full knobbly tyres. The bike is very usable at slow speed - i am currently running a 32/10 twin shock bevel box on the gs rear end the bike is very usable to about 90mph then it gets a bit more buzzy - but that could be something not quite balanced up (ie wheels tires etc never been balanced but keeps on pulling well upto about 100mph where she really starts to lose the will to go much faster but by then on this tank shes getting kind of interesting to hold onto.) Overtaking is easy top gear is usable from pretty low speeds right through so overtaking is fine. Fuel wise I get about 11 mile litre) so about 50 per gallon give or take a bit here and there depending on roads and speed etc. I have changed from a 2 into 1 with y piece ( siebenrock sgs2) since these figures to a non standard keihen race 2 into 2 system - so really a new dyno test should be run. The bike feels better with the 2 into 2 system.
Thanks for the hands on description adv950. It does sound like the power band is a bit narrow like mentioned before. I just point that out because you can narrow the power band moving peak torque either way. That is what is great about BMW's 336. They have a wide power band. I installed my 336 while doing very little else to the engine and not having to down shift for getting around cars was one of the first things I noticed. What I once had to do in forth and sometimes third and could motor through in fifth loaded up and riding double. The difference being from around 80mph with a 33/11 in my case but still . . . .

My question is with that cam does it shake and shudder less loading the engine much below 2800rpm say? My sport cam was no different in that way than the stock cam.
supershaft is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2012, 01:03 PM   #14
adventure950
Anglo-Saxon
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Location: Northumberland UK
Oddometer: 505
Hi supershaft I would say its really smooth at lower revs there is virtually no shake and shudder above 2000 revs but its still an airhead so there is some feel to the motor but not like it used to be.( in fact i am able to slow the engine in top gear on level ground to little over 1600 revs ride along quite smooth and gently pull away without any major protest from the engine) Before doing the mods the bike would protest below 3000revs and would bog down easily in higher gears at low speed, But now my bike is really easy to ride low down and i have got into a bad habit of sitting in top gear at 2000 revs - pootling along in traffic then just opening the throttle and off she goes nothing no rattle, protest - shake or feeling of bogging down. Its what I wanted for riding on slippy wet and or icy roads ideal. Like you say the pay off is at the top end - she really is not suited to high revs and sustained higher speed. Anything over 85mph starts to feel more strained and the engine feels like its really working a bit harder. She will pull up to the ton but its all a bit uncomfortable - Like you say you gain one end and pay off the other end the other thing is I am using a 5% higher top gear and a %5 lower first so that alters the drive ratios a little bit.

. The roads i ride most though often are very winding gravel strewn and slippy so the bikes set up is suited for that type of riding. Problem is i did so many changes at once its hard to say what did what - some of the work was undertaken on my behalf by Motoren Israel in Germany who are up there with the best guys for their knowledge and expertise in airheads so they knew what i wanted and developed the best solution. Jake.
__________________
'A tourist sees what he went to see,
a traveller sees what he sees'

adventure950 screwed with this post 06-12-2012 at 01:17 PM
adventure950 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2012, 02:22 PM   #15
supershaft
because I can
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Location: San Francisco Bay area
Oddometer: 8,006
I think I can understand how cam timing might lower the shakes and shudders. I would think it would be mostly flywheel but what works works! Maybe someday I will be able to check a bike out with a cam like that. Time will tell if loading the engine that much at that low of a rpm is hard on the rod big ends.

My riding style is just the opposite of yours. Ice, gravel, wet? I keep my revs high. More steadying engine gyroscopics and better traction control in my opinion. If my back tire breaks loose at high rpm, my engine has no where to rev because it is already at top of its power band. If I ride around like you at the beginning of the power band and my tire breaks loose, look out! My engine can gain 3000rpm lickity split and that is a lot of wheel spin. In the mean time, my faster spinning engine components are steadying my bike like a auto gyro. Different strokes for different folks. I would still like to check out one of those cams! Thanks again adventure950!
supershaft is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Share

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

.
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


Times are GMT -7.   It's 01:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ADVrider 2011-2014