ADVrider

Go Back   ADVrider > Bikes > GSpot > Parallel Universe
User Name
Password
Register Inmates Photos Site Rules Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 07-28-2012, 01:04 PM   #1
Ash OP
UFO Pilot
 
Ash's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Location: Berkshire England
Oddometer: 468
F650 Twin sprocket choice

i would like to make the gearing taller from the stock 17 tooth front and 41 tooth rear.
could i go to 39 tooth on the rear , so it's smoother or would it kill it ?
or would a 40 tooth rear be wiser ?

Ash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2012, 01:24 PM   #2
bobobob
badbadbad
 
bobobob's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Location: On a hill
Oddometer: 4,594
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ash View Post
i would like to make the gearing taller from the stock 17 tooth front and 41 tooth rear.
could i go to 39 tooth on the rear , so it's smoother or would it kill it ?
or would a 40 tooth rear be wiser ?

What is your split on road/dirt use percentage wise?
Do you want faster acceleration and better 1st gear grunt for tight trail situations?
Or do you prefer more relaxed freeway high speed cruising and better mpg?

Your answers will help with a suggestion.
__________________
.

It is just a bunch of inner tubes Roy . . . - Cannonshot
Growing old is compulsory - growing up is optional. - Haroon
bobobob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2012, 01:52 PM   #3
GH41
Studly Adventurer
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Oddometer: 809
If you weigh 90 lbs and travel light you might get away with the proposed change. Are you prepared for less acceleration and possibly lower fuel milage?? Taller gearing doesn't always get better milage but it always means the engine has to work harder to maintain a given speed. I am actualy going the other way with my 658. I am dropping a tooth on the front for better power down low but I never ride faster than 70mph. GH
GH41 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2012, 02:07 PM   #4
Ash OP
UFO Pilot
 
Ash's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Location: Berkshire England
Oddometer: 468
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobobob View Post
What is your split on road/dirt use percentage wise?
Do you want faster acceleration and better 1st gear grunt for tight trail situations?
Or do you prefer more relaxed freeway high speed cruising and better mpg?

Your answers will help with a suggestion.
90% roads use and i prefer more relaxed freeway high speed cruising and better mpg?

Ash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2012, 04:23 PM   #5
markymcd
Studly Adventurer
 
markymcd's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Oddometer: 882
I know it's an odd combo but 18 / 44 works really well.

the 18 is very hard to find and a bitch to get on because it's just a tad too big for the space up there but i've used this combo for about a month now and love it. You get the versatility to put a 17 on for your off road adventures.

so far i've tried 17/41 (stock) 16/41, 17/42, 16/42 and now 18/44

cheers,
Mark
__________________
www.adventuredecals.com
markymcd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2012, 01:13 AM   #6
Johnnyboxer
Studly Adventurer
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Location: Yorkshire, UK
Oddometer: 993
I think the OP wants to to reduce the revs, for a given mph on the highway

He's not at all interested in offroad as he never ventures off tarmac, so lowering the gearing is of no interest

So he's considering fitting 17/40 or 39 to reduce the revs & so vibes at say 70 or 80mph

Would this work?
__________________
So many roads...........So little time..!!!

2005 BMW R1150GS Adv - Black
2005 BMW R1150GS Adv - Silver
2007 BMW G650 XCountry - Black
Johnnyboxer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2012, 05:15 AM   #7
JRWooden
Beastly Adventurer
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Location: The great state of confusion
Oddometer: 4,112
Quote:
Originally Posted by markymcd View Post
I know it's an odd combo but 18 / 44 works really well.

the 18 is very hard to find and a bitch to get on because it's just a tad too big for the space up there but i've used this combo for about a month now and love it. You get the versatility to put a 17 on for your off road adventures.

so far i've tried 17/41 (stock) 16/41, 17/42, 16/42 and now 18/44

cheers,
Mark
Mark:
You're a better man than I am I'm pretty sure that at least with some of those combinations if someone sneaked into my garage and made them I'm not sure I would notice the difference ... I'm just not that good at fine detail....

41/17 is 2.41

42/17 is 2.47

44/18 is 2.44

My sprockets are almost due for a change so it's a good time for me to try something else...
What were the differences you felt across these changes?

Thanks,
Jim
JRWooden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2012, 09:36 AM   #8
Maxacceleration
What now
 
Maxacceleration's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Location: Wa
Oddometer: 1,857
The stock gearing is so nice on the 658. As is a relaxed rpm at highway speeds.
Tall enough IMO because some headwinds & mountain passes whiled loaded (touring gear silly) will have you going down to 5th or 4th at times.
1st gear is usually low enough for most situations. I have done very technical two track trail and the 658 works well at idle through those situations.
If you are dog paddling through technical stuff a -1 countershaft sprocket could be advantageous.
Over gearing it will have you going a gear or two lower (than normal) on the passes and you will be doing the same rpm's anyway...
IMO from idle to top speeds the 658 is geared well and gets good fuel mileage doing it.
From my experience cruising from 70-90 kills mpg's (upper 40's). 55 to 70 and the 658 pushes 60 mpg (57-58 for me)
YMMV
__________________
Horsepower is a distant second to useable torque, unless cafe cruising is the reason for the purchase...
Quote:
Originally Posted by DireWolf
Sounds dangerous.
Maxacceleration is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2012, 11:45 AM   #9
markymcd
Studly Adventurer
 
markymcd's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Oddometer: 882
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnnyboxer View Post
I think the OP wants to to reduce the revs, for a given mph on the highway

He's not at all interested in offroad as he never ventures off tarmac, so lowering the gearing is of no interest

So he's considering fitting 17/40 or 39 to reduce the revs & so vibes at say 70 or 80mph

Would this work?
the 18/44 is slightly slacker than the stock for the 650 twin. When I first installed this combo it was for a 3 day trip. 1,300KM with 800 of it on gravel, dirt and double track. on our second day which was more technical I was going to swap out the 18 for my 17 but couldn't get the 18 off. Thought it was going to be a crappy day as I remember the original stock ratio not being great for off road but it was just fine.

http://www.bikecalc.com/gear_ratios

with the 18/44 it was pretty rare that I even had to get into 6th gear. I think it might be my favourite overall combo yet.

Mark
__________________
www.adventuredecals.com
markymcd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2012, 11:50 AM   #10
markymcd
Studly Adventurer
 
markymcd's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Oddometer: 882
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRWooden View Post
Mark:
You're a better man than I am I'm pretty sure that at least with some of those combinations if someone sneaked into my garage and made them I'm not sure I would notice the difference ... I'm just not that good at fine detail....

41/17 is 2.41

42/17 is 2.47

44/18 is 2.44

My sprockets are almost due for a change so it's a good time for me to try something else...
What were the differences you felt across these changes?

Thanks,
Jim

Hey Jim,

Where you notice the differences are at over 70mph on the road and off the road on anything slightly technical and slower. With the off road the differences are with the twitchiness of first gear and how much you have to mess around with the clutch.

I've also got the HiTechCoonass WukaKing Power Commander which makes everything much smoother in the lower gears too.

cheers,
Mark.
__________________
www.adventuredecals.com
markymcd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2012, 11:54 AM   #11
markymcd
Studly Adventurer
 
markymcd's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Oddometer: 882
On a side note a couple of other things that help with the vibes.

1) Do not use the BMW hand guards. They use a very light handlebar weight which makes the vibrations worse.

2) I know lots of people would be against it but you can fill your bar with #9 lead shot. Works awesome and unless your a gram counter I wouldn't sweat the difference. The benefit outweighs the detriment in my mind. No difference in steering feel.

Mark
__________________
www.adventuredecals.com
markymcd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2012, 12:08 PM   #12
vtbob
wanderer
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Location: Western Vermont
Oddometer: 500
FWIW

I have a F650GS with the std sprockets....I have essentially NO vibration from 40 to 75mph. At around 85 there is a slight buzz. I do have throttle Miester installed...ie stainless steel bar end weights.

While I normally use Tourance EXPs

For my Alaska trip I put Hideneaus on....they have a significant front wheel resonance at around 20mph. But after the 1st 1000 mile( worn in a bit) nothing on the hiway....they do sing to you though.
vtbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2012, 01:05 PM   #13
JRWooden
Beastly Adventurer
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Location: The great state of confusion
Oddometer: 4,112
Quote:
Originally Posted by markymcd View Post
Hey Jim,

Where you notice the differences are at over 70mph on the road and off the road on anything slightly technical and slower. With the off road the differences are with the twitchiness of first gear and how much you have to mess around with the clutch.

I've also got the HiTechCoonass WukaKing Power Commander which makes everything much smoother in the lower gears too.

cheers,
Mark.

Thanks mark!

I have the IICE mod. on my bike.
I'll get out my crystal ball and re-read your posts and pick out a new ratio!
Likely it won't be a big deal ... I don't get to do lots of technical stuff nor much over 70 mph....

I do have the BMW guards ... I did not realize the bar end weights were lighter............
that really pisses me off ...
1) why did BMW do that
2) why didn't I notice that when I installed them ..........
JRWooden is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Share

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

.
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


Times are GMT -7.   It's 11:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ADVrider 2011-2014