ADVrider

Go Back   ADVrider > Bikes > Road warriors
User Name
Password
Register Inmates Photos Site Rules Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 05-24-2013, 10:35 AM   #586
opticalmace
Gnarly Adventurer
 
opticalmace's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Location: London, Ontario
Oddometer: 132
Wonder how these would be as an upgrade from a Ninja 250R...
opticalmace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2013, 10:57 AM   #587
scooterspirit
Ilovekitty
 
scooterspirit's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Location: Alongandlonelyhighway
Oddometer: 712
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cortez View Post
0-60 (62 actually) on the NC700X is in the 6,5s ballpark, so with same power
and less weight, I'm assuming 5,5-6 seconds.

Pegaso has 48hp but about 40lbs less then the 500s, and it'll do 62 mph
in exactly 5 seconds.
sounds like you are saying the 500 is a lot faster than the 700 0-62. Over in the NC folder they said its time was 4.9 sec, here they say the 500 is 5 secs, about the same.

You've ridden the 700 some, do you think the 500 will feel faster around town? The 700 seems like it would have more grunt on the highway.

For what I do, pooting around town and country, the 250 gives me everything the 500 could.
__________________
Anything within the circle of my bike, I control, ...
scooterspirit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2013, 03:48 PM   #588
The Killstar
Ted Simon Acolyte
 
The Killstar's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Oddometer: 306
That's exactly the struggle I'm having. For a starter bike, considering the cost difference, I don't know if the 500 is worth it.

That being said, if I could afford a 500 with no stipulations, I would have it. I really think its a great bike, and if I didn't have a super dependable bike right now, I would go for the 500 no problem.
__________________
Watch out for snakes! - Crow T Robot
2000 Honda Sabre (Sold)
2010 Triumph T100 Black
"Absolutely! If we didn't like visually beautiful bikes we'd all ride V-Stroms or something." - Av8rPaul
The Killstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2013, 07:26 PM   #589
dduelin
Oh boy that was close
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: Shaft City
Oddometer: 1,284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cortez View Post
0-60 (62 actually) on the NC700X is in the 6,5s ballpark, so with same power
and less weight, I'm assuming 5,5-6 seconds.

Pegaso has 48hp but about 40lbs less then the 500s, and it'll do 62 mph
in exactly 5 seconds.
The NC700X manual 0-60 mph just a tick under 5 seconds.

http://www.cycleworld.com/2012/10/18...x-road-test/3/

Folks buy horsepower but usually end up riding torque and the 670cc motor has 38% more of it. [+/- 32 ft/lbs vs 44] The 500s and the 700 will be close in 0-60 acceleration test numbers but in the type of riding done everyday we rarely twist it redline every gear and it helps to have a plump midrange where we normally operate the motor.
__________________
Honda ST1300
Honda NC700X
Honda CH80

Dave
dduelin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2013, 03:35 AM   #590
Cortez
BAZINGA!
 
Cortez's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Location: Croatia
Oddometer: 6,694
Quote:
Originally Posted by scooterspirit View Post
sounds like you are saying the 500 is a lot faster than the 700 0-62. Over in the NC folder they said its time was 4.9 sec, here they say the 500 is 5 secs, about the same.
I've seen those number and I doubt them (for the 700).
A LOT faster for the 500? No, but it's lighter, it should be a bit faster.

Quote:
Originally Posted by scooterspirit View Post
You've ridden the 700 some, do you think the 500 will feel faster around town? The 700 seems like it would have more grunt on the highway.
The 700X feels faster around town then my 100hp FZ6, the 500 hass
less torque and needs more revs to move, there's no way it'll feel faster
then the 700 in normal riding conditions.

The 700X off the idle is like a 1000cc inline4 and at small throttle openings.
__________________
'08 Yamaha FZ6n S2 ABS

SOLD: '03 Peugeot Speedfight2, '07 Kawasaki ER6F ABS, '06 Kymco Agility 125, '12 Kymco Downtown 300i ABS
My Flickr gallery --- My 500px gallery
Cortez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2013, 03:36 AM   #591
Cortez
BAZINGA!
 
Cortez's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Location: Croatia
Oddometer: 6,694
Quote:
Originally Posted by dduelin View Post
The NC700X manual 0-60 mph just a tick under 5 seconds.

http://www.cycleworld.com/2012/10/18...x-road-test/3/

Folks buy horsepower but usually end up riding torque and the 670cc motor has 38% more of it. [+/- 32 ft/lbs vs 44] The 500s and the 700 will be close in 0-60 acceleration test numbers but in the type of riding done everyday we rarely twist it redline every gear and it helps to have a plump midrange where we normally operate the motor.
+1 (but again, I doubt the 5 second 0-60 time..)
__________________
'08 Yamaha FZ6n S2 ABS

SOLD: '03 Peugeot Speedfight2, '07 Kawasaki ER6F ABS, '06 Kymco Agility 125, '12 Kymco Downtown 300i ABS
My Flickr gallery --- My 500px gallery
Cortez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2013, 04:31 AM   #592
sendler
Studly Adventurer
 
sendler's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Location: Syracuse, NY USA
Oddometer: 655
Quote:
Originally Posted by opticalmace View Post
Wonder how these would be as an upgrade from a Ninja 250R...
For canyon racing the Ninja250 is pretty quick due to it's light weight. For long distance travel or commuting or for tall people that need more leg room, The CBR500R will be much smoother, roomier and more solid in rain and wind.
sendler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2013, 10:51 AM   #593
Auto-X Fil
Studly Adventurer
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Location: Montrose, PA.
Oddometer: 502
I'm really looking for an F or X, but I'm going to test ride an R next week (because it's available). I'll report back!
Auto-X Fil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2013, 11:24 AM   #594
YJake
Roaming
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: West Panhandle, FL
Oddometer: 294
I was hoping to see more pictures in this thread but I guess nobody on her is buying these bikes huh?

-Jake
__________________
Touring The Gulf
YJake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2013, 10:38 PM   #595
rnewb
n00b
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Location: Roswell, GA
Oddometer: 3
I can post some pics tomorrow. I have a tricolor 500R. Anything in particular you'd like me to focus on?
rnewb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2013, 07:26 AM   #596
Flightar
Gnarly Adventurer
 
Flightar's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Location: Sebastian, FL.
Oddometer: 137
Quote:
Originally Posted by opticalmace View Post
Wonder how these would be as an upgrade from a Ninja 250R...
Its a great upgrade to the Ninja 250...my room mate had a 2011 250, and now has a CB 500F. So, I have ridden them both extensively. If you have a 250 then everything you like about it you'll love about the CB. The CB even has mostly the same engine charcteristics. You just get more smoothness, more power, more room, and the option of hard luggage depending on which model CB you want.
Flightar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2013, 07:55 AM   #597
Inzane123
Adventurer
 
Joined: May 2013
Oddometer: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by YJake View Post
I was hoping to see more pictures in this thread but I guess nobody on her is buying these bikes huh?

-Jake
Here is one from yesterdays ride.

Inzane123 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2013, 09:37 AM   #598
YJake
Roaming
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: West Panhandle, FL
Oddometer: 294
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inzane123 View Post
Here is one from yesterdays ride.

Nice!

I'm contemplating replacing my Ninja 250 with one of these CB500s or an NC700x for an "Around Town" and short trip bike. I have a liter bike for back road hooliganism and road trips already. I'm just not sure I'm gaining enough with the purchase of the CB or NC to justify buying one

-Jake
__________________
Touring The Gulf
YJake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2013, 05:26 PM   #599
Auto-X Fil
Studly Adventurer
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Location: Montrose, PA.
Oddometer: 502
I took a quick test ride on a CBR500R today.

It looks like a sport bike, it smells like a sport bike, but it's not a sport bike. Not even a little bit.

The position is high, very "standard". The pegs are pretty high and back, more agressive than the bars, but still not like a RR. I wasn't a huge fan of the pull-back angle of the CRB500R bars, but they are clip-ons so that's easily remedied. They seemed too aggressive for the high position. My knees fit very nicely in the tank depressions, and it's a generally comfy, full-sized position for my 6' frame.

The power is amazingly linear. People looking for excitement will call it "flat", but it pulls pretty eagerly all the way up. It is very smooth, very quiet, and very grown-up. It's certainly not a 250: overtaking and freeway cruising happen without wringing the snot out of it. They happen faster if you do. The torque down low lets it pull from 3k or less, although I wouldn't say it pulls eagerly. At no point is there anything like a rush of power or a lightness of the front wheel, which can be a good or bad thing.

In any case, the naked look certainly matches the character of the bike, and I feel that the CBR version is a bit of a sheep in wolf's clothing. I'll be looking at the F, although that's obviously just my personal take on the aesthetics.

It's a really nice bike that drops neatly between the 250/300 class, and the various 650 thumpers and twins. I'm not positive that I'll prefer this over a 650GS thumper, but the fact that the BMW is the same price used as the Honda is new certainly sways things a bit.

Auto-X Fil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2013, 05:39 PM   #600
yooperbikemike
high, wide and handsome
 
yooperbikemike's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Location: The blue groove
Oddometer: 12,362
Honda CBR500R | Price: $5999 ($6499 w/ABS)

Engine type: l-c parallel-twin
Valve train: DOHC, 8v
Displacement: 471cc
Bore x stroke: 67.0 x 66.8mm
Compression: 10.7:1
Fuel system: EFI
Clutch: Wet, multi-plate
Transmission: 6-speed
Measured horsepower: 44.5 bhp @ 8700 rpm
Measured torque: 28.9 lb.-ft. @ 7000 rpm
Corrected 1⁄4-mile: 13.63 sec. @ 93.80 mph
Top-gear roll-on, 60-80 mph: 8.26 sec.
Frame: Steel semi-double-cradle
Front suspension: Showa 41mm fork
Rear suspension: Showa shock with adjustable spring preload
Front brake: Nissin two-piston caliper, 320mm disc, optional ABS
Rear brake: Nissin one-piston caliper, 240mm disc, optional ABS
Front tire: 120/70ZR-17 Dunlop D222F
Rear tire: 160/60ZR-17 Dunlop D222
Rake/trail: 25.5°/4.1 in.
Seat height: 30.9 in.
Wheelbase: 55.5 in.
Fuel capacity: 4.1 gal.
Weight (tank full/empty): 430/405 lbs. (ABS model)
Fuel mileage (hi/low/avg.): 61/43/53 mpg
Colors: Black, Pearl White/Blue/Red, Red
__________________
"...people in the stands want to see good, close racing. The thing is to put on a show, and that’s what’s going to draw people in..." -- Scotty Parker



yooperbikemike is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Share

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

.
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


Times are GMT -7.   It's 07:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ADVrider 2011-2014