![]() |
10-19-2012, 08:41 AM
|
#16 |
|
Common as muck
Joined: Jul 2009
Location: Washington USA
Oddometer: 489
|
|
|
|
10-19-2012, 08:55 AM
|
#17 | |
|
Wild Feral BRP
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: Los Alamos, Northern NM
Oddometer: 3,413
|
Quote:
I think that is the video rate, 4 kilobytes/sec which would be about 32 Mbps (megabits per sec).
__________________
2005 XR650R - plated 2003 KDX220 - plated 2003 KX250 - plated |
|
|
|
10-19-2012, 09:00 AM
|
#18 |
|
Common as muck
Joined: Jul 2009
Location: Washington USA
Oddometer: 489
|
|
|
|
10-19-2012, 09:11 AM
|
#19 |
|
oot & aboot
Joined: Jun 2003
Location: Colorado
Oddometer: 26,168
|
Wifi?
Wifi takes 20-30 seconds to transfer a SINGLE RAW 24mp image from my nex7 - waaaaaaay too slow. What are the wifi's capabilities/uses in the device? Anyone know? I take it is just being used as a remote control interface and not a video transfer method? Aspherical is cool.. except everyone's going to be riding slower now (the fisheye made things look so fast!)
__________________
www.motogeek.com Geek screwed with this post 10-19-2012 at 09:22 AM |
|
|
10-19-2012, 09:20 AM
|
#20 |
|
oot & aboot
Joined: Jun 2003
Location: Colorado
Oddometer: 26,168
|
Watching this video in 1080p.. the lens and the dynamic range of the hero 3 are impressive!
__________________
www.motogeek.com |
|
|
10-19-2012, 09:38 AM
|
#21 | |
|
Beastly Adventurer
Joined: Mar 2010
Location: Denver, USA
Oddometer: 3,827
|
Quote:
I highly doubt it's to transfer raw movie files. A 5-6 hour recording in 1080p at 30fps was about 20-24 GB on the original hero, quite big for WIFI.
__________________
"Civilize the mind, but make savage the body." To the house of a friend the way is never long. "Show respect to all, but grovel to none." '12 690 Enduro |
|
|
|
10-19-2012, 09:42 AM
|
#22 | |
|
Beastly Adventurer
Joined: Mar 2010
Location: Denver, USA
Oddometer: 3,827
|
Quote:
In a nutshell, it's the next standard movie resolution after Blu-Ray/1080p. Super high end TV's support it now. 4096 × 2160 is the generally accpeted resolution of 4K, you could call it 2160p 1920 x 1080 is 1080p Good picture of the difference:
__________________
"Civilize the mind, but make savage the body." To the house of a friend the way is never long. "Show respect to all, but grovel to none." '12 690 Enduro |
|
|
|
10-19-2012, 09:46 AM
|
#23 |
|
Type A ADD w/ OCD
Joined: Apr 2012
Location: Colorado
Oddometer: 180
|
Holeeee crap that's huge!
I'm not certain I would ever have need for that. On second thought maybe I'll just get a Hero II. lol
__________________
The rider formerly known as r6dink. 2006 R1200GS w/ '07 motor |
|
|
10-19-2012, 10:12 AM
|
#24 |
|
Beastly Adventurer
Joined: Mar 2010
Location: Denver, USA
Oddometer: 3,827
|
If anything I'd run the camera on 2k or 1080p mode with the higher frame rates. Resizing a 4k down to 1080p also tends to add sharpness depending on how the 4k resolution on their recording chip is achieved.
__________________
"Civilize the mind, but make savage the body." To the house of a friend the way is never long. "Show respect to all, but grovel to none." '12 690 Enduro |
|
|
10-19-2012, 10:25 AM
|
#25 |
|
Gnarly Adventurer
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: denver co
Oddometer: 428
|
All that just to post it on youtube and it will still look like crap. I could see it being a big deal if you were making a movie or something but for something to show your buddies how cool you are it is a little overkill.
|
|
|
10-19-2012, 11:36 AM
|
#26 |
|
Wild Feral BRP
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: Los Alamos, Northern NM
Oddometer: 3,413
|
at 4k you're gonna need alot of RAM
__________________
2005 XR650R - plated 2003 KDX220 - plated 2003 KX250 - plated |
|
|
10-19-2012, 11:40 AM
|
#27 | |
|
oot & aboot
Joined: Jun 2003
Location: Colorado
Oddometer: 26,168
|
Quote:
![]() Cripes comcast could you downgrade your signal any further?
__________________
www.motogeek.com |
|
|
|
10-19-2012, 12:05 PM
|
#28 | |
|
Wild Feral BRP
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: Los Alamos, Northern NM
Oddometer: 3,413
|
If the screen resolution is at 4096 x2160 and the CMOS (I believe) chip size is 6.2 mm x 4.6 mm that would imply a native resolution of 2-3 um^2. I hardly believe that they are pushing the limit of the pixel size.. More pixels is just more pixels and doesn't mean your are gonna twice the image quality of the GoPro 2; The image resolution is mostly improved by going to aspherics (not pixel density) to remove distortion and improved focus.
![]() Quote:
__________________
2005 XR650R - plated 2003 KDX220 - plated 2003 KX250 - plated |
|
|
|
10-19-2012, 12:06 PM
|
#29 |
|
Beastly Adventurer
Joined: Mar 2010
Location: Denver, USA
Oddometer: 3,827
|
Smugmug is decent on their video quality imo.
I've been playing around with getting streaming setup on my webserver. Wish the browsers would all support the same video streaming codecs for HTML5 (and last I checked a year or so ago they didn't).
__________________
"Civilize the mind, but make savage the body." To the house of a friend the way is never long. "Show respect to all, but grovel to none." '12 690 Enduro |
|
|
10-19-2012, 12:18 PM
|
#30 | |
|
oot & aboot
Joined: Jun 2003
Location: Colorado
Oddometer: 26,168
|
Quote:
I'm about to Elite my Teir V T49
__________________
www.motogeek.com |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Share |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|