ADVrider

Go Back   ADVrider > Bikes > Thumpers
User Name
Password
Register Inmates Photos Site Rules Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 11-15-2012, 09:42 PM   #1
Capt. Egregious OP
Gnarly Adventurer
 
Capt. Egregious's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Location: Where the sewer meets the sea, Edmonds Wa
Oddometer: 343
What year KTM 300 XCW should I get?

I have decided that I need a lighter bike to race. My current ride is a XR650R, it's a great bike but very top heavy. I came to this conclusion around 1a.m. during the 24 hour's of Starvation Ridge. I must have hoisted the bike out of the mud 20 times that night. While resting and watching the few remaining bikes going by I pondered what bike would be easier to pick up, restart and maybe keep upright. The KTM 300 xcw is what I came up with. I have never owned a KTM so I know very little about them. I don't have a ton of money to invest in a dirt bike so that rules out the 6 speed 2011 and newer xcw's. So what year or year's should I be looking for? Is the E-start worth the money and weight on the 08 and newer bikes? XC vs XCW pro's and con's? Any advise/comments would be much appreciated.
Capt. Egregious is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 08:00 AM   #2
GAS GUY
MILE EATER
 
GAS GUY's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: Garden City, Michigan
Oddometer: 2,849
2008 and up should have a superior chassis and suspension.
Although e-start is not as important on a 2 stroke, most guys really like it.
__________________
2008 KLR 705
2001 GAS GAS 321
2004 ST1300
IBA # 23,716
http://gasguysadventures.blogspot.com/
GAS GUY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 08:03 AM   #3
dlrides
1:1.618
 
dlrides's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Newton NC
Oddometer: 5,206
Quote:
Originally Posted by GAS GUY View Post
2008 and up should have a superior chassis and suspension.
Although e-start is not as important on a 2 stroke, most guys really like it.
This


After a 300, you will never go back. Dependable as a rock.
__________________
"The BSC was strong in that one, had to get out !"
dlrides is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 10:39 AM   #4
dhally
Hammerhead
 
dhally's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Location: Kennewick, WA
Oddometer: 1,997
If you don't have much $$ might look at a used Gasgas EC300. They go for a lot less than KTM's, and are quite similar in power and handling. I'm not so sure they make a wide ratio transmission. Mine had a 6-speed but not a huge spread.

www.gasgasrider.org for all the info
__________________
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
WR250R
Tiger 800
dhally is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 10:43 AM   #5
jar944
Studly Adventurer
 
jar944's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Location: Chantilly VA
Oddometer: 543
09+ suspension is the way to go.
jar944 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 10:11 PM   #6
Capt. Egregious OP
Gnarly Adventurer
 
Capt. Egregious's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Location: Where the sewer meets the sea, Edmonds Wa
Oddometer: 343
Thanks for the input. Sounds like I should buy the newest 300 I can afford. I will look into the GasGas 300 too. Seem's like the KTM is the most supported between all the 2smoke 300's. I will be selling my road racing bike to fund the new bike, should have 3-4k to work with. I have seen a few 06 and 07's in my price range but so far the 08 and up bike's seem to be pretty pricey.

Capt. Egregious screwed with this post 11-16-2012 at 10:16 PM
Capt. Egregious is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2012, 08:55 AM   #7
Capt. Egregious OP
Gnarly Adventurer
 
Capt. Egregious's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Location: Where the sewer meets the sea, Edmonds Wa
Oddometer: 343
What do you guys think about this bike? It has the trans ratio's I'm looking for, it's listed 13 lbs lighter then the XCW, should have closed chamber forks, the stroke is the same as the 300 so when it's time for a top end I could install a 72mm piston and cylinder. Any thoughts? Both XCW and sx trail/rake are listed as the same.


http://seattle.craigslist.org/sno/mcy/3366161577.html
Capt. Egregious is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2012, 09:57 AM   #8
jar944
Studly Adventurer
 
jar944's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Location: Chantilly VA
Oddometer: 543
Quote:
Originally Posted by Capt. Egregious View Post
What do you guys think about this bike? It has the trans ratio's I'm looking for, it's listed 13 lbs lighter then the XCW, should have closed chamber forks, the stroke is the same as the 300 so when it's time for a top end I could install a 72mm piston and cylinder. Any thoughts? Both XCW and sx trail/rake are listed as the same.


http://seattle.craigslist.org/sno/mcy/3366161577.html
all the 07/08-10 250cc+ bikes have the same frame (with different cradles) but the sx/f dont have the kickstand boss on the frame.

the sx 1st seems strange as it's normally considered high for trail work. price seems high to me, but i'm on the other coast.
jar944 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2012, 10:06 AM   #9
Foot dragger
singletracker
 
Foot dragger's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Location: chico,just below rag dump(nor-cal)
Oddometer: 12,675
Quote:
Originally Posted by Capt. Egregious View Post
Thanks for the input. Sounds like I should buy the newest 300 I can afford. I will look into the GasGas 300 too. Seem's like the KTM is the most supported between all the 2smoke 300's. I will be selling my road racing bike to fund the new bike, should have 3-4k to work with. I have seen a few 06 and 07's in my price range but so far the 08 and up bike's seem to be pretty pricey.
A newer 300 is always nice,I ride an 04 and I dont think it holds me back a bit,never use all the power it makes in the woods,its not heavy at all. With proper suspension settup/jetting it goes real fast real easy,Ive been woods riding since I was a small child so that may make a difference.

Ive tried an Ohlin's shock on mine but Im back to the stock shock currently,forks have been done by a local tuner,I need stiffer springs in them still. Even with settup work Im not in it over 3 grand,it hauls ass and is reliable as a rock.
The 04's got the redesign on bore/stroke and a few other things,very smooth torquey engine.

Rider makes more difference by far then the bike.
__________________
Some bikes around at times
Foot dragger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2012, 10:10 AM   #10
Foot dragger
singletracker
 
Foot dragger's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Location: chico,just below rag dump(nor-cal)
Oddometer: 12,675
Quote:
Originally Posted by Capt. Egregious View Post
What do you guys think about this bike? It has the trans ratio's I'm looking for, it's listed 13 lbs lighter then the XCW, should have closed chamber forks, the stroke is the same as the 300 so when it's time for a top end I could install a 72mm piston and cylinder. Any thoughts? Both XCW and sx trail/rake are listed as the same.


http://seattle.craigslist.org/sno/mcy/3366161577.html
Installing that 300 top end is not even moderately cheap,buying a 300 to start with might make more sense.
Lotta fast guys prefer the 250 though.

Oddly I can go faster on a KTM 200 in almost all trail riding conditions,and they wear a person out less. Brute power only goes so far on tight trails. 300 is fun cause it has so much extra power.
__________________
Some bikes around at times
Foot dragger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2012, 01:20 PM   #11
gatorgrizz27
Gnarly Adventurer
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Oddometer: 131
IMO a properly setup 250 SX is the cat's ass for hare scramble type racing, especially if you are a more aggressive rider. If you stand up most of the time and hammer whoops, etc, the factory suspension is pretty much perfect, it rides high in the stroke and is very controlled feeling. If you sit down a lot and ride super rocky/rooted trails you might want to remove a few shims from the base valve and run thinner fluid.

I ran one with a flywheel weight, power valve set to open as soon as possible, slightly fat jetting on the bottom and slightly lean on top, and a Gnarly pipe. You could lug it up steep hills at below idle rpm, or get it up on the pipe and really let it rip. The power band was incredibly smooth and not tiring at all, it was never a handfull or wore you out.

Only drawbacks for some might be the 5 speed trans and the lack of e-start. I don't remember what gearing I was running but mine would top out at around 60. It could have easily pulled taller gearing though and still been manageable on tight trails. Most of the time I would run in 2 or 3, and hit 4 on longer straits.
gatorgrizz27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2012, 04:50 PM   #12
Capt. Egregious OP
Gnarly Adventurer
 
Capt. Egregious's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Location: Where the sewer meets the sea, Edmonds Wa
Oddometer: 343
Great info guy's. Thank you. I'm mostly looking for a lighter weight, better balanced bike to race. I rode a YZ 250 for years growing up, I don't remember ever thinking "I just need more power". Since I will be keeping the XRR I don't need massive power in the new bike. I am not dead set on the cc size but the gear ratio and weight/balance is what I'm sold on. Still on the hunt for the new bike
Capt. Egregious is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2012, 10:57 PM   #13
Capt. Egregious OP
Gnarly Adventurer
 
Capt. Egregious's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Location: Where the sewer meets the sea, Edmonds Wa
Oddometer: 343
Maybe I should have asked what year and what size XCW/EXC should I get...

So, I have been researching light weight, wide ratio 2smoke's. At first I felt the 250/300 XCW would be right up my ally but finding a 08' and up in my price bracket seems to be a pipe dream. Also I feel I don't need that much power. so I have lowered the bar a bit. It seems the 200 XCW/EXC can be picked up much cheaper then it's larger bore(and stroke) brothers. What are the thoughts on the 200? Should I settle or just keep saving my pennies for the bike I lust for?

The bike I am looking for does not need to be street plated. I ride in a mix of mostly wet terrain. Woods, single track, mud, not so open desert(Pacific north west). There is a 05' 300 EXC that is in my price range but looks rough. Given the choice between a 09' 200 XCW or a 05' 300 EXC or a 08' 250 SX/XCW mongrel, all similar in price. What bike do you think would be best(given all the bikes are mechanically sound)? Seems like I am splitting hairs.
Capt. Egregious is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2012, 02:08 PM   #14
Luke
GPoET&P
 
Luke's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: Idiotville, OR
Oddometer: 4,052
The 200 has a smaller frame than the 250/300. Depending on your size this could be good or bad. It didn't work for me at all, which was too bad because otherwise it was a really nice bike, especially for tight woods.


But no matter what you get, it's going to be hard to lift in Starvation Ridge mud.
Luke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2012, 02:25 PM   #15
dentvet
Beastly Adventurer
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Location: hunt country virginia
Oddometer: 1,221
I think the 09 200 has the same frame as 250/300 bikes. Test ride them and see what you like. The terrain you describe doesn't really demand a wide tranny so include the modern 2t yz250 on your list.
dentvet is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Share

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

.
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


Times are GMT -7.   It's 04:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ADVrider 2011-2014