ADVrider

Go Back   ADVrider > Riding > Layin' down tracks > GPS 101 - Which GPS For Me
User Name
Password
Register Inmates Photos Site Rules Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 02-26-2013, 09:50 AM   #46
Colebatch
"Moto Porn"ographer
 
Colebatch's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Location: Schmocation
Oddometer: 3,960
Quote:
Originally Posted by Albie View Post
Nope, easier to use the ZUMO with big routes for long trips
Well I just did a 3.5 month off road trip from Europe with pre drawn off map, offroad tracks on a Montana .... http://www.advrider.com/forums/showthread.php?t=834987 Several hundred thousand points ... turn by turn, preloaded for over 3 months of travel.

So think you are missing something there

There was a guy with a zumo along with me, but his tracks all had to be loaded one day at a time, had to be converted to routes and then had to be filtered down to 250 points max per route. While the Montana took 3 months of high detail tracks all in one go.

I think you are just not getting the potential of the Montana.
__________________
*** New Sibirsky Extreme Trail DVD Trailer HERE ***
Moroccan Extreme 2011 DVD available HERE
World Motorcycle Altitude Record video HERE
Sibirsky Extreme - The Home of Adventure Motorcycling in Siberia and Mongolia - On Facebook
Colebatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2013, 12:22 PM   #47
Emoto
Sure, why not?
 
Emoto's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Location: SE Mass
Oddometer: 17,898
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colebatch View Post
Well I just did a 3.5 month off road trip from Europe with pre drawn off map, offroad tracks on a Montana .... http://www.advrider.com/forums/showthread.php?t=834987 Several hundred thousand points ... turn by turn, preloaded for over 3 months of travel.

So think you are missing something there

There was a guy with a zumo along with me, but his tracks all had to be loaded one day at a time, had to be converted to routes and then had to be filtered down to 250 points max per route. While the Montana took 3 months of high detail tracks all in one go.

I think you are just not getting the potential of the Montana.
Did you have a way for these tracks to alert you when you were approaching a turn, or did you do that by watching the screen?
__________________
Eventual Master of the Obvious
2005 R1200GS | 2013 R1200GSW | SOHC4 208 | DoD 2032 | BMWMOA | BMWRA | YB
Proud walking jingle in the midnight sun.
Smugmug Discount: https://secure.smugmug.com/signup?Coupon=mStnWv71mNkjo
Support .orgs that work to protect your rights: ACLU, NRA, EFF
Emoto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2013, 03:56 PM   #48
Albie
Kool Aid poisoner
 
Albie's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: Upstate SC
Oddometer: 8,592
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colebatch View Post
Well I just did a 3.5 month off road trip from Europe with pre drawn off map, offroad tracks on a Montana .... http://www.advrider.com/forums/showthread.php?t=834987 Several hundred thousand points ... turn by turn, preloaded for over 3 months of travel.

So think you are missing something there

There was a guy with a zumo along with me, but his tracks all had to be loaded one day at a time, had to be converted to routes and then had to be filtered down to 250 points max per route. While the Montana took 3 months of high detail tracks all in one go.

I think you are just not getting the potential of the Montana.

Not missing anything. I've used routes extensively and they work much better for navigation then tracks. The Montana has a limit of 50 via points, you can a hell of a lot more with 250 points.
__________________
Good. Bad. I'm the guy with the gun.

Another day, another foot injury!

Albie screwed with this post 02-26-2013 at 05:13 PM
Albie is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2013, 04:53 PM   #49
thebugslayer
Adventurer
 
thebugslayer's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2012
Location: middleburg va
Oddometer: 56
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colebatch View Post
Well I just did a 3.5 month off road trip from Europe with pre drawn off map, offroad tracks on a Montana .... http://www.advrider.com/forums/showthread.php?t=834987 Several hundred thousand points ... turn by turn, preloaded for over 3 months of travel.

So think you are missing something there

There was a guy with a zumo along with me, but his tracks all had to be loaded one day at a time, had to be converted to routes and then had to be filtered down to 250 points max per route. While the Montana took 3 months of high detail tracks all in one go.

I think you are just not getting the potential of the Montana.
Thank you Colebatch. Those are very helpful specifics from an adv legend. I'm slow following up your post because I got sucked into one of your ride reports. Legendary stuff.
__________________
2007 r1200s
2008 wr250r
2009 dorsoduro
thebugslayer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2013, 04:12 AM   #50
FiveG
Gnarly Adventurer
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Location: Connecticut, USA
Oddometer: 148
Now I'm confused

I'm in this debate as well. Screen visibility/replaceable batteries are big for me. Don't care about in-helmet voices. Really like to be able to carry a bag of rechargeable batteries rather than plug the GPS into the bike.

Does anyone have a picture comparing the two screens next to each other for size etc.?

Also, I'm seeing inconsistent statements on tracks vs. routes (which I never understood anyway). Do tracks do on-screen turn by turn navigation? Because if the only difference is whether the annoying, nagging, spouse-from-hell voice won't work with tracks, I'm all in with the Montana.

BTW, mostly will use for road, but portability between bikes (as opposed to wiring into bike) is important for me.

Thanks.
__________________
--------------
I hope you succeed, but no matter what happens, Godzilla will win.

"Steve Martin," Godzilla (1985)
FiveG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2013, 05:28 AM   #51
Emoto
Sure, why not?
 
Emoto's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Location: SE Mass
Oddometer: 17,898
Quote:
Originally Posted by FiveG View Post
I'm in this debate as well. Screen visibility/replaceable batteries are big for me. Don't care about in-helmet voices. Really like to be able to carry a bag of rechargeable batteries rather than plug the GPS into the bike.

Does anyone have a picture comparing the two screens next to each other for size etc.?

Also, I'm seeing inconsistent statements on tracks vs. routes (which I never understood anyway). Do tracks do on-screen turn by turn navigation? Because if the only difference is whether the annoying, nagging, spouse-from-hell voice won't work with tracks, I'm all in with the Montana.

BTW, mostly will use for road, but portability between bikes (as opposed to wiring into bike) is important for me.

Thanks.
Tracks do not give voice directions. They merely sit there on your screen like a highlighter you drew with on a map. You have to look down and see that you are staying on it when it goes off, say, to the left.

Routes, on the other hand, have both vocal and visual proximity alerts that you can set for how much in advance of a turn to alert you. At X distance prior to the turn, the voice says "in two tenths of a mile, turn left onto Main st." and the screen changes to a zoomed in view of the turn with an arrow on it showing you which way to go, which is particularly helpful when an intersection offers multiple choices because you already know which one to pick when you get there.

I believe the Zumo 660/665 has a battery you can change out,although it might be some odd type rather than AA. The Zumo 350 has an internal battery that cannot easily be swapped out by the user. The Montana has a (odd type) battery that can be swapped out easily, but it also accepts AAs. I don't know what kind of bike you are running that you don't want to power the unit off the bike, but once you wire up the cradle that holds the unit, you don't have to fool with wires again and your unit charges as you ride, which to me seems ideal.
__________________
Eventual Master of the Obvious
2005 R1200GS | 2013 R1200GSW | SOHC4 208 | DoD 2032 | BMWMOA | BMWRA | YB
Proud walking jingle in the midnight sun.
Smugmug Discount: https://secure.smugmug.com/signup?Coupon=mStnWv71mNkjo
Support .orgs that work to protect your rights: ACLU, NRA, EFF
Emoto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2013, 05:35 AM   #52
Albie
Kool Aid poisoner
 
Albie's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: Upstate SC
Oddometer: 8,592
The screen visibility on the Montana is much better then on the ZUMO. But to achieve that great screen visibility you're gonna have to run the backlight on all the time so battery life will be cut severely. Screen size is very close.

Tracks do not do turn by turn navigation or notification of such. They are the equivalent of tracing on a map with a hilighter.

I have multiple bikes and multiple GPS's. Hardwiring is no real issue. I use SAE plugs for power so it's only a matter of plugging in whichever Garmin harness and mount I need. Takes less time then swapping out a set of batteries.
__________________
Good. Bad. I'm the guy with the gun.

Another day, another foot injury!
Albie is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2013, 08:23 AM   #53
live2ridetahoe
RN
 
live2ridetahoe's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: Concord, CA
Oddometer: 1,217
I too am looking at these two units and am having a hard time deciding. I am thankful there are several forums and experience riders to help me decide.

Most of my travels are on roads, with the occasional fire road/jeep trails up in the Sierra. I am hoping to do the WABDR and ORBDR this fall, and I have read that a GPS is handy for those rides. I have been riding with folks who have done rides where they preload rides into their GPSs and follow the tracks.

I like the idea of downloading GPS tracks and doing someone else's ride. Can one do that with a Zumo or do you need a Montana?

I have a BT Sena unit paired with my iPhone and really like it. I like the idea of XM with the Zumo unit.

I was looking at the Montana that is preprogrammed with Topo, the 650t I believe. Do you need to by the North America city/street maps to navigate on the road? Do you have to load that on a separate card and insert it into the unit to navigate the streets?

Thanks for all of your inputs. I really appreciate it.

JG
live2ridetahoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2013, 01:45 PM   #54
Ricky Chuck
Red Green Rulz!
 
Ricky Chuck's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: Yukon, Oklahoma
Oddometer: 391
Great discussion. I have been an on-road rider with a Zumo 550, but I really want to start exploring the dirt roads of this country. So, if I were able to load an off-road route, say of FS roads or vague dirt roads cutting across the Jicarilla Reservation, or get off and explore back ways across country, I have two questions...assume there is a Topo program that would show where you were, if not by name, then by the locator? Are these marked by names like "dirt road", lol? Also, if I have uploaded an off-road route that follows trails and forks in trails and dirt tracks that split around...maybe these would be tracks, dunno, still trying to learn the jargon...if it was a route would it announce something like "turn right at fork in road", or are these by necessity tracks you would need to keep up with visually?
__________________
2004 BMW R1150R
Ricky Chuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 03:44 AM   #55
Emoto
Sure, why not?
 
Emoto's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Location: SE Mass
Oddometer: 17,898
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ricky Chuck View Post
Great discussion. I have been an on-road rider with a Zumo 550, but I really want to start exploring the dirt roads of this country. So, if I were able to load an off-road route, say of FS roads or vague dirt roads cutting across the Jicarilla Reservation, or get off and explore back ways across country, I have two questions...assume there is a Topo program that would show where you were, if not by name, then by the locator? Are these marked by names like "dirt road", lol? Also, if I have uploaded an off-road route that follows trails and forks in trails and dirt tracks that split around...maybe these would be tracks, dunno, still trying to learn the jargon...if it was a route would it announce something like "turn right at fork in road", or are these by necessity tracks you would need to keep up with visually?
Jargon help:

"Route" - will announce upcoming turns. Requires that the road or trail be routable. Many small backroads like dirt roads in state parks are often routable, but some are not. I don't know how to know that in advance of trying to route over one.

"Track" - as mentioned above by Albie, is just like a highlighter line drawn on a map. No upcoming turn announcements, nor will it announce if you deviate form the track; you have to keep an eye on the screen to make sure you're still on it. However, a track can be drawn over anything. In other words, it does not need the map beneath it to be routable. So, tracks are used to draw the way on things like hiking paths or across a field, etc. You can also use tracks when traveling on roads, but you will have to draw it along the road by hand just like if you were using a highlighter marker on a paper map. Routes on the other hand, will stick to roads and you can put in a starting point and an end point and the route will fill in the rest, all long the roads.

Both the 660 and the Montana will do routes and display tracks. The 660 offers slightly more developed road routing features like "detour" to let you get around a closed bridge when following a route and that sort of thing. The Montana has a much more customizable UI. If you can play with both, see which one you like better. Both are excellent units.
__________________
Eventual Master of the Obvious
2005 R1200GS | 2013 R1200GSW | SOHC4 208 | DoD 2032 | BMWMOA | BMWRA | YB
Proud walking jingle in the midnight sun.
Smugmug Discount: https://secure.smugmug.com/signup?Coupon=mStnWv71mNkjo
Support .orgs that work to protect your rights: ACLU, NRA, EFF
Emoto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 05:01 AM   #56
shipwrek12001
Shipwrek
 
shipwrek12001's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Location: Ottawa
Oddometer: 2,040
I use a 550...

I wish I had a Montana..

using the 550 for road routing works well, has the option to "detour". but using the 550 off road, it will always detour you to a road. it really doesn't like you going off the road. I imagine the 660 is the same software in a new body. I do use the 550 off road regularly and set it up so it doesn't know where it is going. remove any routing capability, including removing the city nav. map.

I have only seen the Montana work, loading a track keeps it as a track unlike the 550 turning a track into a route. Just for that feature to be able to route or track is enough for me to want the Montana...

but 6 years ago my choice was track or route with tunes... tunes won

Montana with tracks, routes and tunes is a no brainer
shipwrek12001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2013, 02:59 AM   #57
Emmbeedee
Procrastinators
 
Emmbeedee's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Location: Near Ottawa, ON, Canada
Oddometer: 8,794
Quote:
Originally Posted by shipwrek12001 View Post

Montana with tracks, routes and tunes is a no brainer
The only way you'll listen to tunes while using a Montana is if they're on a phone or media device. The Montana Rugged Mount has a cable out for voice navigation but no media playback capabilities.
__________________
Want to know more about the Garmin Montana? See the Wisdom and FAQ Thread.
Want to know more about the Garmin VIRB? See here.
"The motorcycle, being poorly designed for both flight and marine operation, sustained significant external and internal damage," police noted.
Emmbeedee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2013, 03:31 AM   #58
roadspirit
Gnarly Adventurer
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Location: Athens, Greece
Oddometer: 130
Regarding the use of Montana for long trips, it can most certainly do it. I used one for my 5-month trip across South America, from Buenos Aires north to Colombia and then all the way down to Ushuaia.

I used routes, tracks, multiple maps. It can handle all. I had no prior experience with any other gps device, montana was my first so I can not make any comparisons. But I'm quite happy with it.
__________________
John

south america trip
roadspirit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2013, 04:29 AM   #59
shipwrek12001
Shipwrek
 
shipwrek12001's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Location: Ottawa
Oddometer: 2,040
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emmbeedee View Post
The only way you'll listen to tunes while using a Montana is if they're on a phone or media device. The Montana Rugged Mount has a cable out for voice navigation but no media playback capabilities.

I was under the impression you could load mp3's on a chip and have them play (bluetooth) to your headset, like I do now with the 550...
__________________
Fak it, just go....
shipwrek12001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2013, 04:36 AM   #60
Emmbeedee
Procrastinators
 
Emmbeedee's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Location: Near Ottawa, ON, Canada
Oddometer: 8,794
Quote:
Originally Posted by shipwrek12001 View Post
I was under the impression you could load mp3's on a chip and have them play (bluetooth) to your headset, like I do now with the 550...
Sorry to be the one to burst your bubble, Sean. The Montana has no Bluetooth or Media capabilities. You should update your rotary dial cell phone if you want tunes...
__________________
Want to know more about the Garmin Montana? See the Wisdom and FAQ Thread.
Want to know more about the Garmin VIRB? See here.
"The motorcycle, being poorly designed for both flight and marine operation, sustained significant external and internal damage," police noted.
Emmbeedee is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Share

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

.
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


Times are GMT -7.   It's 09:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ADVrider 2011-2014