![]() |
03-08-2013, 06:44 PM
|
#1 |
|
Adventurer
Joined: Nov 2012
Location: Texas
Oddometer: 65
|
2008 KTM 250XCF-W vs 2008 Yahmaha WR250R
I am kind of new to dirt biking. I have ridden the WR and liked it, but feel I would outgrow it pretty quick. (been riding a KLR650 on dirtbike trails so height and weight are not an issue for me).
Anyway - the 2 bikes in the title are the ones I am looking at except the year on the WR changes depending on what ad I look at. All these bikes are around $3k. The KTM is boarded out to 300cc and from a dealership. (price = I know a guy) We do woods, creeks, hills, everything. What do y'all think? I kind of have a thing for KTM and really want one eventually. Friends talked me out of a 450 for now.
|
|
|
03-08-2013, 07:57 PM
|
#2 |
|
incognito
Joined: Sep 2009
Location: eastside
Oddometer: 16,002
|
I had an '08 250XCF-W and found it challenging to ride in tight technical stuff as the motor really needs to rev to generate power. I ultimately had it bored to a 320cc. I suspect the owner of the bike you are looking at probably had the same issue.
The WR has a much wider and friendly powerband. The KTM has better suspension. Both will do the job but the WR is easier to ride. My .02 cents. (Before this gets punted to thumpers. )
__________________
the sun does not have no prisoners |
|
|
03-09-2013, 04:34 AM
|
#3 |
|
Spelt with 2 ffs
Joined: Nov 2005
Location: Melbourne Australia
Oddometer: 11,481
|
Bit slow tonight.
![]() Off to Thumpers we go.
|
|
|
03-09-2013, 04:49 AM
|
#4 |
|
Gnarly Adventurer
Joined: Mar 2011
Location: Parker, CO
Oddometer: 164
|
I have ridden both, prefer the WR. The KTM does have better suspension, but the motor is gutless compared to the WR, which acts like it has 50cc more displacement in comparison.
WR suspension is soft and mushy, but it easier to fix that than it is to fix the KTMs motor. I heard the KTM does respond really well to a big bore though, and that the stock carb is a bit oversized. It all comes together a lot better with the bore kit. Sounds like your potential bike is all set up with that. The little WR motor is absolutely indestructible, another plus. Get the KTM though. Your potential bike sounds good, and the orange mafia won't let you ride with them if you show up on blue. Don't ask how I know
__________________
2010 Husaberg FE450 (plated) 2006 Yamaha FZ1 |
|
|
03-09-2013, 06:30 AM
|
#5 |
|
beat up ex flat tracker
Joined: Dec 2006
Location: chico,just below rag dump(nor-cal)
Oddometer: 6,770
|
Your talking about the street legal WR250R Yamaha? I dont know if Id want a 300 lb 250 trailbike. I know guys love em to death but that's more then my 530KTM weighs. If your a learning trailrider there are better bikes then both of these.
The KTM is like a racebike,the WR is a bloated cheaply built econobox dualsport. Ive always ridden 2 strokes in tight woods,light and simple to work on. Honda quit building XR's so they dont have much to offer anymore,their 230 is a real heavy cheap bike but some guys ride em anyway. Try a 200 or 250 2 stroke KTM and see what you think. A used clean XR250 is a great learning trailbike.
__________________
2003 DR 650.(1976 Montesa 250 Enduro-nice!) - - 1990 MASI TEAM-3V.- 1976 Motobecane, Super-Mirage.- Kona, HumuHumuNukuNukuApua'a. Single Speed ThRaShEr BiKe. 1968 360 Greeves challenger MXer. 1999 Triumph Trophy 1200. 2011 KTM530 EXC. 2012 KONA Hei Hei Deluxe (ongoing bike issues) -2009 KTM 200XC-W. |
|
|
03-14-2013, 05:43 PM
|
#6 |
|
Adventurer
Joined: Nov 2012
Location: Texas
Oddometer: 65
|
put $1,000 down on a 2008 WR250R today.
![]() When I upgrade to a 450 in a couple years will get a KTM. Thanks! |
|
|
![]() |
| Share |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|